Comparison Overview

Institute of Classical Architecture & Art

VS

Audubon Nature Institute

Institute of Classical Architecture & Art

20 W 44th Street, Suite 310, New York, NY, 10036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Institute of Classical Architecture & Art (ICAA), founded as two separate nonprofit organizations in 1991 and 1968, respectively, merged in 2002. The Institute is the leading national nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing the practice and appreciation of the classical tradition in architecture and the allied arts. Serving a broad constituency nationwide, the ICAA’s mission is first and foremost Education. Design practitioners, students, and enthusiasts can find Continuing Education, Professional Intensive Courses, a Certificate in Classical Design, the Beaux-Arts Atelier, Public Programming, publications via The Classical America Series in Art and Architecture, a peer-reviewed journal entitled The Classicist, and Travel Programs to fulfill professional practice and intellectual needs. Fifteen regional chapters are active across the country supported by a national headquarters based in New York.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 85
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Audubon Nature Institute

6500 Magazine St., None, New Orleans, LA, US, 70118
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Audubon Nature Institute is a unique private, not-for-profit organization with an expansive collection of world-class attractions, conservation programs, facilities and wilderness lands, sustainability initiatives, events, venues, and public parks all connected by the common purpose of celebrating, protecting, and connecting guests to the wonders of nature. Audubon family consists of: Audubon Park and Riverview, Audubon Zoo, Audubon Aquarium, Audubon Insectarium, Woldenberg Riverfront Park, Audubon Louisiana Nature Center, Audubon Species Survival Center, Audubon Wilderness Park, and Audubon Nature Institute. We believe in leaving things better than we found them. Our goal is to educate, empower, and inspire everyone to do good by taking action to protect nature and wildlife.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 403
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-of-classical-architecture-&-art.jpeg
Institute of Classical Architecture & Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/audubon-nature-institute.jpeg
Audubon Nature Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Institute of Classical Architecture & Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Audubon Nature Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute of Classical Architecture & Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Audubon Nature Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Institute of Classical Architecture & Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute of Classical Architecture & Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Audubon Nature Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Audubon Nature Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-of-classical-architecture-&-art.jpeg
Institute of Classical Architecture & Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/audubon-nature-institute.jpeg
Audubon Nature Institute
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Institute of Classical Architecture & Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Audubon Nature Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Audubon Nature Institute company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Institute of Classical Architecture & Art company has not reported any.

In the current year, Audubon Nature Institute company and Institute of Classical Architecture & Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Audubon Nature Institute company nor Institute of Classical Architecture & Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Audubon Nature Institute company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Institute of Classical Architecture & Art company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Audubon Nature Institute company nor Institute of Classical Architecture & Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Institute of Classical Architecture & Art company nor Audubon Nature Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Institute of Classical Architecture & Art nor Audubon Nature Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Institute of Classical Architecture & Art company nor Audubon Nature Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Audubon Nature Institute company employs more people globally than Institute of Classical Architecture & Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Institute of Classical Architecture & Art nor Audubon Nature Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Institute of Classical Architecture & Art nor Audubon Nature Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Institute of Classical Architecture & Art nor Audubon Nature Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Institute of Classical Architecture & Art nor Audubon Nature Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Institute of Classical Architecture & Art nor Audubon Nature Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Institute of Classical Architecture & Art nor Audubon Nature Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X