Comparison Overview

Institute for State Effectiveness

VS

Oliver Wyman Forum

Institute for State Effectiveness

1050 30th St. NW, Washington, DC, DC, 20007, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

The Institute for State Effectiveness (ISE) is a non-governmental organization based in Washington, D.C. that seeks to address the challenge of accountability and governance through a system-building approach across governments, markets and people. We believe that underlying many of today’s challenges is a systemic crisis in accountability and effectiveness of governance. We believe the opportunity lies in creating approaches to equip leaders and managers with the knowledge, skills and tools to create inclusive policies and accountable institutions. Our years of field work in frontier and emerging countries, leading teams and developing programs at the World Bank, and studying “what works” around the world, led us to discover a set of approaches that work. Today we are focused on developing and systematizing this know-how to support leaders and organizations at the forefront of policy design and implementation. We aim to make cutting-edge methodologies, tools and rigorous metrics available to the global community, by sharing methods that are less costly yet more impactful than many current approaches. Twitter: https://twitter.com/effectivestates

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Oliver Wyman Forum

Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Oliver Wyman Forum is committed to bringing together business, public policy, and social enterprise leaders to help solve the world’s toughest problems. The Oliver Wyman Forum strives to discover innovative solutions by convening leading thinkers, analyzing options, and inspiring action on several broad fronts: Reframing Industry, Business In Society, and Global Economic And Political Change. Over time, we will engage with more experts, influencers, and thought leaders in different disciplines and geographies. We will also conduct research on a broader range of issues and challenges that so far have remained difficult to frame or conclusively solve. Together with our growing and diverse community of experts in business, public policy, social enterprises, and academia, we think we can make a difference. Join this active and engaged community. Follow us!

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-state-effectiveness.jpeg
Institute for State Effectiveness
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oliverwymanforum.jpeg
Oliver Wyman Forum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Institute for State Effectiveness
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oliver Wyman Forum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute for State Effectiveness in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oliver Wyman Forum in 2025.

Incident History — Institute for State Effectiveness (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute for State Effectiveness cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oliver Wyman Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oliver Wyman Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-state-effectiveness.jpeg
Institute for State Effectiveness
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oliverwymanforum.jpeg
Oliver Wyman Forum
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2021
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Institute for State Effectiveness company and Oliver Wyman Forum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Oliver Wyman Forum company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Institute for State Effectiveness company has not reported any.

In the current year, Oliver Wyman Forum company and Institute for State Effectiveness company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Oliver Wyman Forum company nor Institute for State Effectiveness company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Oliver Wyman Forum company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Institute for State Effectiveness company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Oliver Wyman Forum company nor Institute for State Effectiveness company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Institute for State Effectiveness company nor Oliver Wyman Forum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Institute for State Effectiveness nor Oliver Wyman Forum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Oliver Wyman Forum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Institute for State Effectiveness company.

Oliver Wyman Forum company employs more people globally than Institute for State Effectiveness company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Institute for State Effectiveness nor Oliver Wyman Forum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Institute for State Effectiveness nor Oliver Wyman Forum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Institute for State Effectiveness nor Oliver Wyman Forum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Institute for State Effectiveness nor Oliver Wyman Forum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Institute for State Effectiveness nor Oliver Wyman Forum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Institute for State Effectiveness nor Oliver Wyman Forum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X