Comparison Overview

Institute for Southern Studies

VS

Latino Coalition for a Healthy California

Institute for Southern Studies

undefined, Durham, NC, 27707, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Founded by civil rights veterans in 1970, the Institute for Southern Studies is a non-profit media, research and education center based in Durham, North Carolina. The Institute is publisher of Facing South, the South's leading online magazine of public affairs, and Southern Exposure, the award-winning journal of politics and culture.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Latino Coalition for a Healthy California

1225 8th Street, Sacramento, CA, 95814, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 1992, the Latino Coalition for a Healthy California (LCHC) is the only Latinx-led statewide policy and advocacy organization protecting and advancing Latinx health equity. We are a cross-sector coalition of community leaders, advocates, policy advisors, administrators and providers united by our common belief in protecting Latinx health and advancing health equity for all. Our work consists of community-centered programming, policy and advocacy development, and strategic communications

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-southern-studies.jpeg
Institute for Southern Studies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/latino-coalition-for-a-healthy-california.jpeg
Latino Coalition for a Healthy California
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Institute for Southern Studies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Latino Coalition for a Healthy California
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute for Southern Studies in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Latino Coalition for a Healthy California in 2025.

Incident History — Institute for Southern Studies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute for Southern Studies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Latino Coalition for a Healthy California (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Latino Coalition for a Healthy California cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-southern-studies.jpeg
Institute for Southern Studies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/latino-coalition-for-a-healthy-california.jpeg
Latino Coalition for a Healthy California
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Latino Coalition for a Healthy California company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Institute for Southern Studies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Latino Coalition for a Healthy California company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Institute for Southern Studies company.

In the current year, Latino Coalition for a Healthy California company and Institute for Southern Studies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Latino Coalition for a Healthy California company nor Institute for Southern Studies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Latino Coalition for a Healthy California company nor Institute for Southern Studies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Latino Coalition for a Healthy California company nor Institute for Southern Studies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Institute for Southern Studies company nor Latino Coalition for a Healthy California company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Institute for Southern Studies nor Latino Coalition for a Healthy California holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Institute for Southern Studies company nor Latino Coalition for a Healthy California company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Latino Coalition for a Healthy California company employs more people globally than Institute for Southern Studies company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Institute for Southern Studies nor Latino Coalition for a Healthy California holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Institute for Southern Studies nor Latino Coalition for a Healthy California holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Institute for Southern Studies nor Latino Coalition for a Healthy California holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Institute for Southern Studies nor Latino Coalition for a Healthy California holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Institute for Southern Studies nor Latino Coalition for a Healthy California holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Institute for Southern Studies nor Latino Coalition for a Healthy California holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H