Comparison Overview

Institute for Public Accuracy

VS

Joint Venture Silicon Valley

Institute for Public Accuracy

1714 Franklin Street #100-133, Oakland, CA, 94612-3409, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Institute for Public Accuracy was founded in mid-1997 by Norman Solomon with the support of a two-year $100,000-per-year Public Interest Pioneer grant from the Stern Family Fund. IPA opened its national office in San Francisco in October 1997. Several months later, IPA established its media office in the National Press Building in Washington, D.C. It is a 501(c)(3) organization. IPA increases the reach and capacity of progressive and grassroots organizations (at no cost to them) to address public policy by getting them and their ideas into the mainstream media. IPA gains media access for those whose voices are commonly excluded or drowned out by government or corporate-backed institutions. As a national consortium of independent public-policy researchers, analysts and activists, IPA widens media exposure for progressive perspectives on many issues including the environment, human rights, foreign policy, and economic justice. IPA has developed a detailed set of constantly updated databases of producers, commentators, and journalists at media institutions across the country. Generally, IPA news releases are most effective when they address breaking news stories. We have reached wide audiences by using major news developments as pegs for quickly providing accurate information and alternative analysis. While regularly making it possible for numerous policy analysts, scholars and other independent researchers to be heard in mass media, IPA boosts many progressive grassroots groups with scant resources for media outreach. Since 1998, IPA news releases have promoted analysts from more than 1000 different organizations doing work on a wide variety of public-policy issues.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Joint Venture Silicon Valley

undefined, San Jose, CA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Joint Venture Silicon Valley is a think tank created and supported by the major sectors (business, government, labor and academia). Through the Institute for Regional Studies, the organization provides research assessing the Valley's challenges and opportunities; Joint Venture is also a platform where leaders develop shared priorities and take collaborative action. For more information, visit www.jointventure.org. Interact with Silicon Valley's online data hub at www.SiliconValleyIndicators.org.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-public-accuracy.jpeg
Institute for Public Accuracy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joint-venture-silicon-valley-network.jpeg
Joint Venture Silicon Valley
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Institute for Public Accuracy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Joint Venture Silicon Valley
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute for Public Accuracy in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joint Venture Silicon Valley in 2025.

Incident History — Institute for Public Accuracy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute for Public Accuracy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Joint Venture Silicon Valley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joint Venture Silicon Valley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-public-accuracy.jpeg
Institute for Public Accuracy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joint-venture-silicon-valley-network.jpeg
Joint Venture Silicon Valley
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Institute for Public Accuracy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Joint Venture Silicon Valley company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Institute for Public Accuracy company.

In the current year, Joint Venture Silicon Valley company and Institute for Public Accuracy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley company nor Institute for Public Accuracy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley company nor Institute for Public Accuracy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley company nor Institute for Public Accuracy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Institute for Public Accuracy company nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Institute for Public Accuracy nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Institute for Public Accuracy company.

Joint Venture Silicon Valley company employs more people globally than Institute for Public Accuracy company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Institute for Public Accuracy nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Institute for Public Accuracy nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Institute for Public Accuracy nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Institute for Public Accuracy nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Institute for Public Accuracy nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Institute for Public Accuracy nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X