Comparison Overview

Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR)

VS

Aspen Digital

Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR)

Bo-ai Road, No. 172, Zhongzheng District, Taipei City, TW
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR, 財團法人國防安全研究院) is dedicated to advancing knowledge-based policy analysis and strategic assessment in support of Taiwan’s national security and defense strategy. Established on May 1, 2018, and headquartered in Taipei, Taiwan, INDSR serves as a hub for rigorous analysis, informed dialogue, and innovative thinking. The Institute is committed to generating forward-looking insights and fostering impactful discussions on a broad spectrum of critical issues, including international security and defense policy, China’s political and military developments, emerging and non-traditional security threats, hybrid and cognitive warfare, and cybersecurity. INDSR is organized into four specialized research divisions: the Division of National Security Research, the Division of Chinese Politics, Military and Warfighting Concepts, the Division of Cyber Security and Decision-Making Simulation, and the Division of Defense Strategy and Resources.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Aspen Digital

2300 N St NW, Washington, 20037, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Aspen Digital is a nonpartisan technology and information-focused organization that brings together thinkers and doers to uncover new ideas and spark policies, processes, and procedures that empower communities and strengthen democracy. A future-focused program of the Aspen Institute, we inspire collaboration among diverse voices from industry, government, and civil society to ensure our interconnected world is accessible, safe, and inclusive – both online and off.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-national-defense-and-security-research.jpeg
Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspen-digital-program.jpeg
Aspen Digital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aspen Digital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspen Digital in 2025.

Incident History — Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aspen Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspen Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-national-defense-and-security-research.jpeg
Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR)
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: underwater surveillance devices, deep-sea spying technology, covert data collection
Motivation: military intelligence gathering, strategic maritime dominance, geopolitical advantage, territorial dispute leverage
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspen-digital-program.jpeg
Aspen Digital
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aspen Digital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Aspen Digital company has not reported any.

In the current year, Aspen Digital company and Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aspen Digital company nor Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aspen Digital company nor Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Aspen Digital company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) company nor Aspen Digital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) nor Aspen Digital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aspen Digital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) company.

Neither Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) nor Aspen Digital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) nor Aspen Digital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) nor Aspen Digital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) nor Aspen Digital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) nor Aspen Digital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) nor Aspen Digital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X