Comparison Overview

Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR)

VS

The Henry Jackson Society

Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR)

105 Hatfield Street,, Cape Town, Western Province -, 8001, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ijr.org.za

The Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) was launched in the year 2000, in the aftermath of South Africa´s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. The aim was to ensure that lessons learnt from South Africa´s transition from apartheid to democracy were taken into account as the nation moved ahead. Today, the Institute helps to build fair, democratic and inclusive societies in Africa through carefully selected engagements and interventions. With uncompromising excellence at the core of its work, IJR has earned a reputation for high-quality research, bold policy suggestions, and reconciliation work with impact on the ground. IJR employs a diverse and professional staff. Archbishop Desmond Tutu is the Institute's longstanding patron. The organisation has a well-established track record of sound corporate governance, and has enjoyed steady growth over the past decade.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Henry Jackson Society

Millbank Tower, London, England, SW1P 4QP, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749
http://www.henryjacksonsociety.org

A cross-party, transatlantic think tank. The HJS believes that modern liberal democracies set an example to which the rest of the world should aspire. We support a forward strategy – involving diplomatic, economic, cultural, and/or political means — to assist those countries that are not yet liberal and democratic to become so. We support maintenance of a strong military, by the United States, the countries of the European Union and other democratic powers, armed with expeditionary capabilities with a global reach, that can protect our homelands from strategic threats, forestall terrorist attacks, and prevent genocide or massive ethnic cleansing. We have a strong commitment to individual and civil liberties in democratic states, even and especially when we are under attack. The Henry Jackson Society is dedicated to researching and debating these issues. We do not represent any specific political party or persuasion, but provide a forum for those who agree with these simple guiding principles, or who wish to learn more about them.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-justice-and-reconciliation.jpeg
Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-henry-jackson-society.jpeg
The Henry Jackson Society
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Henry Jackson Society
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Henry Jackson Society in 2025.

Incident History — Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Henry Jackson Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Henry Jackson Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-justice-and-reconciliation.jpeg
Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-henry-jackson-society.jpeg
The Henry Jackson Society
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Henry Jackson Society company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Henry Jackson Society company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company.

In the current year, The Henry Jackson Society company and Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Henry Jackson Society company nor Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Henry Jackson Society company nor Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Henry Jackson Society company nor Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company nor The Henry Jackson Society company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) nor The Henry Jackson Society holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company nor The Henry Jackson Society company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) company employs more people globally than The Henry Jackson Society company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) nor The Henry Jackson Society holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) nor The Henry Jackson Society holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) nor The Henry Jackson Society holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) nor The Henry Jackson Society holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) nor The Henry Jackson Society holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) nor The Henry Jackson Society holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Published
Date
2025-12-05
Updated
Date
2025-12-05
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Published
Date
2025-12-05
Updated
Date
2025-12-05
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Published
Date
2025-12-05
Updated
Date
2025-12-05
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Published
Date
2025-12-05
Updated
Date
2025-12-05
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-05
Updated
Date
2025-12-05
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References