Comparison Overview

Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT)

VS

Aspen Institute Germany

Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT)

1, None, Washington, D.C., US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.icitech.org

The Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan think tank dedicated to improving the security and resiliency of critical infrastructure that provides for people’s foundational needs. ICIT takes no institutional positions on policy matters. Rather than advocate, ICIT is dedicated to being a resource for critical infrastructure, technology, and communities that are dedicated to making both more secure and resilient.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Aspen Institute Germany

Friedrichstrasse 60, 10117 Berlin, undefined, undefined, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749
http://www.aspeninstitute.de

The Aspen Institute Germany is an international, nonpartisan, and charitable organization. Its mission is to foster values-based leadership, encouraging individuals to reflect on the ideals and ideas that define a good society, and to provide a neutral and balanced venue for discussion and acting on critical issues. The individual and social values of the humanistic tradition are promoted through long lasting networks as well as a continued open-minded and critical discourse among top executives from Europe, America, and the whole world. The Aspen Institute Germany achieves its aims through regular meetings of interdisciplinary groups of decision-makers from the fields of academia, the economy, politics, culture, and the media, whose representatives might otherwise meet only rarely or are even in open conflict with each other. At numerous symposia, conferences, and discussion rounds, the Aspen Institute Germany engages in difficult questions of contemporary politics in detailed, candid, and confiding round tables in order to find common solutions for the challenges of our time.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-critical-infrastructure-technology-icit-.jpeg
Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspen-institute-germany.jpeg
Aspen Institute Germany
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aspen Institute Germany
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspen Institute Germany in 2025.

Incident History — Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aspen Institute Germany (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspen Institute Germany cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-critical-infrastructure-technology-icit-.jpeg
Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspen-institute-germany.jpeg
Aspen Institute Germany
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aspen Institute Germany company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aspen Institute Germany company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) company.

In the current year, Aspen Institute Germany company and Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aspen Institute Germany company nor Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aspen Institute Germany company nor Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aspen Institute Germany company nor Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) company nor Aspen Institute Germany company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) nor Aspen Institute Germany holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) company nor Aspen Institute Germany company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) company employs more people globally than Aspen Institute Germany company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) nor Aspen Institute Germany holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) nor Aspen Institute Germany holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) nor Aspen Institute Germany holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) nor Aspen Institute Germany holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) nor Aspen Institute Germany holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT) nor Aspen Institute Germany holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References