Comparison Overview

INSTATEC

VS

Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o.

INSTATEC

Rambla de la Girada, 3, Vilafranca del PEnedès, Barcelona, 08720, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

INSTATEC es una empresa destinada a la realización de INSTALACIONES INTEGRALES en el campo de la CONSTRUCCIÓN, REABILITACIÓN y MANTENIMIENTO. Uniendo los ámbitos de la INGENIERÍA, las INSTALACIONES y los SERVICIOS ENERGÉTICOS, logramos dar un SERVICIO COMPLETO a nuestros clientes. Nuestra LARGA EXPERIENCIA y el conocimiento de las ÚLTIMAS TECNOLOGIAS, aseguran la SATISFACCIÓN DE NUESTROS CLIENTES.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o.

Modletice, 101, Říčany, Středočeský, CZ, 251 01
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Společnost Jungheinrich vyvíjí a vyrábí vybavení pro intralogistiku již více než 65 let. Jsme rodinou firmou s vlastním zastoupením ve více než 40 zemích světa a 17.000 zaměstnanci. V České republice působíme od roku 1992 a jsme dlouhodobě jedničkou na trhu manipulační techniky v počtu dodaných strojů. Na našich pobočkách v Praze, Olomouci a Mladé Boleslavi pracuje přes 350 zaměstnanců. Ochrana osobních údajů: https://www.jungheinrich.cz/ochrana-osobnich-udaju-607348 Impressum: https://www.jungheinrich.cz/impressum-491592

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 96
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instatec.jpeg
INSTATEC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jungheinrich-čr.jpeg
Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
INSTATEC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INSTATEC in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. in 2025.

Incident History — INSTATEC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INSTATEC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instatec.jpeg
INSTATEC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jungheinrich-čr.jpeg
Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to INSTATEC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to INSTATEC company.

In the current year, Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. company and INSTATEC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. company nor INSTATEC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. company nor INSTATEC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. company nor INSTATEC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither INSTATEC company nor Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither INSTATEC nor Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither INSTATEC company nor Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. company employs more people globally than INSTATEC company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither INSTATEC nor Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither INSTATEC nor Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither INSTATEC nor Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither INSTATEC nor Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither INSTATEC nor Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither INSTATEC nor Jungheinrich (ČR) s.r.o. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H