Comparison Overview

Instant Win Gaming

VS

Grand Casino Hotel & Resort

Instant Win Gaming

undefined, London, Greater London, EC1Y 8AF, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

IWG are the leading supplier of iGaming content to the lottery industry. We supply over 22 national and state lotteries around the globe with innovative, leading-edge content that engages millions of players on a weekly basis. We have over ten years’ experience of making top-selling, high quality instants and the strategic know how to make them work. As well as providing proven mechanics and successful themes, we strive to innovate and keep pushing the boundaries of instant win gaming. IWG has forged an industry leading reputation based on our experience, our drive, and our attention to detail in all areas of the business.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grand Casino Hotel & Resort

777 Grand Casino Blvd, Shawnee, Oklahoma, 74804, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Presented with pride by the Citizen Potawatomi Nation, FireLake Grand Casino is taking Oklahoma gaming to the next level with beautiful architecture inside and out, and a rich experience like no other in Oklahoma. Located a short drive east of Oklahoma City on Interstate 40, our casino features over 125,000 square feet of gaming space filled with over 2,000 of the newest, Vegas-style slots as well as Oklahoma's only Keno lounge. We also feature a luxury 14 story hotel tower and several great dining selections. When it comes to entertainment we at the Grand Casino deliver world class shows from Vegas-style acts to national caliber events including all music genres, comedians, sporting events, and poker championships. The casino is conveniently located just east of Oklahoma City on Interstate 40 at Exit 178. For more information about the Citizen Potawatomi Nation visit www.potawatomi.org.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 175
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instant-win-gaming.jpeg
Instant Win Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/firelake-grand-casino.jpeg
Grand Casino Hotel & Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Instant Win Gaming
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grand Casino Hotel & Resort
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Instant Win Gaming in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grand Casino Hotel & Resort in 2025.

Incident History — Instant Win Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Instant Win Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grand Casino Hotel & Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grand Casino Hotel & Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instant-win-gaming.jpeg
Instant Win Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/firelake-grand-casino.jpeg
Grand Casino Hotel & Resort
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Grand Casino Hotel & Resort company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Instant Win Gaming company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Grand Casino Hotel & Resort company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Instant Win Gaming company.

In the current year, Grand Casino Hotel & Resort company and Instant Win Gaming company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grand Casino Hotel & Resort company nor Instant Win Gaming company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grand Casino Hotel & Resort company nor Instant Win Gaming company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grand Casino Hotel & Resort company nor Instant Win Gaming company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Instant Win Gaming company nor Grand Casino Hotel & Resort company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Instant Win Gaming nor Grand Casino Hotel & Resort holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Instant Win Gaming company nor Grand Casino Hotel & Resort company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Grand Casino Hotel & Resort company employs more people globally than Instant Win Gaming company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Instant Win Gaming nor Grand Casino Hotel & Resort holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Instant Win Gaming nor Grand Casino Hotel & Resort holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Instant Win Gaming nor Grand Casino Hotel & Resort holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Instant Win Gaming nor Grand Casino Hotel & Resort holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Instant Win Gaming nor Grand Casino Hotel & Resort holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Instant Win Gaming nor Grand Casino Hotel & Resort holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H