Comparison Overview

INSS

VS

Malmö stad

INSS

SAS, Quadra 2, Bloco O, Brasília, DF, 70070-907, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.inss.gov.br

O Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social (INSS) é uma autarquia do Governo Federal do Brasil que recebe as contribuições para a manutenção do Regime Geral da Previdência Social, sendo responsável pelo pagamento da aposentadoria, pensão por morte, auxílio-doença, auxílio-acidente, entre outros benefícios previstos em lei. O INSS trabalha junto com a Dataprev, empresa de tecnologia que faz o processamento de todos os dados da Previdência. Está vinculado ao Ministério da Previdência Social.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 16,837
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Malmö stad

August Palms plats 1, Malmö, undefined, 205 80, SE
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://malmo.se/jobb

Bli en samhällsbyggare – jobba i Malmö stad! Genom att arbeta i Malmö stad får du möjlighet att arbeta med hållbar samhällsutveckling. Som en samhällsbyggare spelar du en viktig roll i Malmös utveckling och därför ser vi oss som framtidens arbetsplats. Människors lika värde är en förutsättning för demokrati och är också en självklarhet i vår värdegrund. Med 20 000 medarbetare är Malmö stad en av de största arbetsgivarna i Skåne. Vi har över 400 yrkeskategorier representerade inom 22 förvaltningar. Är du intresserad av att jobba hos oss? Se våra lediga tjänster på http://www.malmo.se/jobb

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 13,521
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inss.jpeg
INSS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/malmo-stad.jpeg
Malmö stad
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
INSS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Malmö stad
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INSS in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Malmö stad in 2025.

Incident History — INSS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INSS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Malmö stad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Malmö stad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inss.jpeg
INSS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/malmo-stad.jpeg
Malmö stad
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

INSS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Malmö stad company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Malmö stad company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to INSS company.

In the current year, Malmö stad company and INSS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Malmö stad company nor INSS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Malmö stad company nor INSS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Malmö stad company nor INSS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither INSS company nor Malmö stad company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither INSS nor Malmö stad holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Malmö stad company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to INSS company.

INSS company employs more people globally than Malmö stad company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither INSS nor Malmö stad holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither INSS nor Malmö stad holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither INSS nor Malmö stad holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither INSS nor Malmö stad holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither INSS nor Malmö stad holds HIPAA certification.

Neither INSS nor Malmö stad holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References