Comparison Overview

Inox wind Limited

VS

Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.

Inox wind Limited

None
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Inox Wind is a fully integrated player in the wind energy market with state-of-the-art manufacturing plants near Ahmedabad (Gujarat) for blades & tubular towers and at Una (Himachal Pradesh) for hubs & nacelles. Inox Wind manufactures key components that ensure high quality, most advanced technology, reliability and cost competitiveness. Inox WTGs are designed for low wind speed sites of India, and are generating around 6% – 18% more generation viz-a-viz other WTGs models available across the nation

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.

Shanghai, 334100, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. (referred to as "JinkoSolar," stock code: 688223) is a globally renowned and highly innovative solar technology company. Embracing the mission of "changing the energy portfolio and taking responsibility for enabling a sustainable future," the company strategically positions itself in the core segments of the photovoltaic industry chain. It focuses on integrated research, development, and manufacturing of photovoltaic products, as well as providing comprehensive clean energy solutions, leading in sales in the global mainstream photovoltaic market. JinkoSolar's products serve over 190 countries and regions worldwide, catering to more than 3,000 customers. For several years, it has maintained its position as the global leader in module shipments. As of the fourth quarter of 2023, the cumulative module shipments of the company have exceeded 200 GW. The company is an industry opinion leader in various international frameworks, including B20, and joined the RE100 green initiative in 2019.

NAICS: 33441
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inox-wind-ltd.jpeg
Inox wind Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jinko-solar-co-ltd-.jpeg
Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Inox wind Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Renewable Energy Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inox wind Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Renewable Energy Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — Inox wind Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inox wind Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inox-wind-ltd.jpeg
Inox wind Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jinko-solar-co-ltd-.jpeg
Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Inox wind Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Inox wind Limited company.

In the current year, Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. company and Inox wind Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. company nor Inox wind Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. company nor Inox wind Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. company nor Inox wind Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Inox wind Limited company nor Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Inox wind Limited nor Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Inox wind Limited company nor Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Inox wind Limited company and Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Inox wind Limited nor Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Inox wind Limited nor Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Inox wind Limited nor Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Inox wind Limited nor Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Inox wind Limited nor Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Inox wind Limited nor Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H