Comparison Overview

Innovations In Learning

VS

Serenity House

Innovations In Learning

8200 Georgia St, Merrillville, 46410, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Innovations In Learning, PC, is a multi-faceted agency. We provide intensive ABA services to children with Autism and related disorders and Behavior Management therapy to individuals in the Waiver program, Day Services for adults with disabilities as well as outpatient services for children and adults including individual and group therapy. In all areas of our work we take pride in using empirically based interventions. We develop objective and measurable goals that allow close monitoring of treatment efficacy. Our intensive ABA program and Adult Day Services are located at our main center on Georgia Street in Merrillville.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Serenity House

None
Last Update:

Serenity House is a licensed residential treatment provider that offers a nurturing environment that promotes tranquility and wellness for the treatment of substance abuse and its related behavioral health disorders. We work under an integrated treatment model that includes psychiatry, medication-assisted treatment, 12-step recovery, and the most advanced, evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapies, including Motivational Enhancement Therapy, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy. At Serenity House, our focus is in our patients. Our mission is to help them regain control of their lives, while teaching them the tools to keep a drug, alcohol, depression and anxiety free lifestyle. We know each patient brings a unique cultural, social and familial perspective to treatment, and each will respond differently to the array of therapies available, so we cater our program to their individual needs. Our vision is integration of a holistic program of total healing that embraces the language of recovery, philosophy, and psychology. Our approach incorporates key healing elements to support your recovery.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/innovations-in-learning.jpeg
Innovations In Learning
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/serenity-house.jpeg
Serenity House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Innovations In Learning
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Serenity House
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Innovations In Learning in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Serenity House in 2026.

Incident History — Innovations In Learning (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Innovations In Learning cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Serenity House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Serenity House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/innovations-in-learning.jpeg
Innovations In Learning
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/serenity-house.jpeg
Serenity House
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Serenity House company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Innovations In Learning company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Serenity House company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Innovations In Learning company.

In the current year, Serenity House company and Innovations In Learning company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Serenity House company nor Innovations In Learning company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Serenity House company nor Innovations In Learning company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Serenity House company nor Innovations In Learning company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Innovations In Learning company nor Serenity House company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Innovations In Learning nor Serenity House holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Innovations In Learning company nor Serenity House company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Innovations In Learning company employs more people globally than Serenity House company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Innovations In Learning nor Serenity House holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Innovations In Learning nor Serenity House holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Innovations In Learning nor Serenity House holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Innovations In Learning nor Serenity House holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Innovations In Learning nor Serenity House holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Innovations In Learning nor Serenity House holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N