Comparison Overview

Inkubate

VS

EPH

Inkubate

75 New Hampshire Ave, Portsmouth, NH, 03801, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Inkubate is a technology company that offers a range of powerful analytic tools related to "fingerprinting" and comparing the writing style of authors. Our principal technology, branded ScoreIt!™, was used to “out” J.K. Rowling as the ghost author Robert Galbraith. After her repeated denials and faced with the technology’s analysis of her writing style, Rowling admitted that she was in fact the author of “A Cuckoo’s Calling.” The very same technology that matched Galbraith to Rowling is helping independent and aspiring writers discover who they write like so that they can pitch their books to the readers of their matching authors. ScoreIt!™ allows writers to zero in on the keywords and phrases that engage and attract their matched authors’ audiences. Writers who enhance their marketing efforts with these keywords and phrases have reported up to double-digit increases in the number of ad impressions and click-throughs associated with their digital marketing efforts. With ScoreIt!™, writers now have a technological "assistant" to help them find their matching authors and titles. Indie writer S.E. (Susan) Smith used to hire book readers to find authors who craft content similar to her own. Smith’s strategy has long been to then pitch her work to the consumers of these matched authors, but Smith concedes that this approach has required enormous reserves of time, energy and money. Now Smith only needs to upload her latest title to the ScoreIt!™ platform to instantly receive her writing style matches and quickly connect to the data that guides her in connecting with the readers of authors matched by science. To learn more about ScoreIt!™, our recently launched tool for writers, and MarkIt!™, our soon-to-be-released tool for agents and publishers, please contact me at [email protected]. DiscoverIt!™ is being developed for the book retail market.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EPH

Koranska 2, Zagreb, undefined, 10000, HR
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

EPH is the biggest newspaper and magazine publisher in Croatia and one of the biggest publishing companies in the greater region, with an average annual circulation of 177 million copies. Europapress Holding (EPH) is the leading publishing and media company in Croatia and one of the biggest companies of this sort in Southeastern Europe. EPH currently employs more than 1300 people. EPH originally sprang from the political weekly “Globus” project, 17 years ago. Since the early 1990-s EPH has grown into a company which is today engaged in a whole plethora of business activities: newspaper and magazine publishing, television and on-line production, production and internal distribution of news and photographic content, printing The EPH portfolio consists of more than 30 publications with annual circulation of more than 177 million copies. In terms of primary target groups, most of our publications are undisputed market leaders.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 2,131
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inkubate.jpeg
Inkubate
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eph.jpeg
EPH
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Inkubate
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EPH
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inkubate in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EPH in 2025.

Incident History — Inkubate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inkubate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EPH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EPH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inkubate.jpeg
Inkubate
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eph.jpeg
EPH
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EPH company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Inkubate company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EPH company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Inkubate company.

In the current year, EPH company and Inkubate company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EPH company nor Inkubate company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EPH company nor Inkubate company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EPH company nor Inkubate company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Inkubate company nor EPH company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Inkubate nor EPH holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Inkubate company nor EPH company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EPH company employs more people globally than Inkubate company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Inkubate nor EPH holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Inkubate nor EPH holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Inkubate nor EPH holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Inkubate nor EPH holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Inkubate nor EPH holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Inkubate nor EPH holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.