Comparison Overview

InkBox Printing 2.0

VS

PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD

InkBox Printing 2.0

12629 Haynes Rd, Houston, Texas, 77066, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

The complete source for all of your graphic and printing needs. Since its inception in 2010, Inkbox Printing had two goals: to cement ourselves in the printing industry by building lasting and growing relationships with our clients while delivering top notch customer service and production. With exceptional, experienced staff members, InkBox is focused on providing a wide range of the latest printing technologies in large and small format digital printing, with a focus on exceeding expectations. Under new innovative ownership since May 2017, Inkbox continues to solidify its foundation through state of the art technology and a commitment to excellence. In addition to print, our graphic designers set us apart by bringing your ideas to life and lifting your brand to new heights. We approach your projects from every angle, and then utilize our many printing and finishing solutions to offer you the greatest result while maintaining cost effectiveness. Through decade long partnerships with some of Houston's most recognizable companies and a client base spanning across the United States, Inkbox 2.0 shows no signs of slowing down. We pride ourselves on being a complete source for all of your graphics and printing needs. Being a premier partner within the Houston Strong community remains our sole focus through knowledge, technology and execution.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD

2 LUCCA RD, WYONG, NSW 2259, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-13

We provide the highest quality self-adhesive labels for all manner of industries. Whether it be food products, animal health, agricultural chemicals or craft brewing, Pacific Labels has the technology, the material options, the market knowledge and the passion to assist in giving your product the edge and eye catching finish that it deserves.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inkbox-printing.jpeg
InkBox Printing 2.0
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-labels-pty-ltd.jpeg
PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
InkBox Printing 2.0
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InkBox Printing 2.0 in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD in 2025.

Incident History — InkBox Printing 2.0 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InkBox Printing 2.0 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inkbox-printing.jpeg
InkBox Printing 2.0
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-labels-pty-ltd.jpeg
PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to InkBox Printing 2.0 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to InkBox Printing 2.0 company.

In the current year, PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company and InkBox Printing 2.0 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company nor InkBox Printing 2.0 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company nor InkBox Printing 2.0 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company nor InkBox Printing 2.0 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither InkBox Printing 2.0 company nor PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither InkBox Printing 2.0 nor PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither InkBox Printing 2.0 company nor PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD company employs more people globally than InkBox Printing 2.0 company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither InkBox Printing 2.0 nor PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither InkBox Printing 2.0 nor PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither InkBox Printing 2.0 nor PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither InkBox Printing 2.0 nor PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither InkBox Printing 2.0 nor PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD holds HIPAA certification.

Neither InkBox Printing 2.0 nor PACIFIC LABELS PTY LTD holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N