Comparison Overview

Ink Floyd Screen Printing

VS

Marquis Book Printing

Ink Floyd Screen Printing

1101 E. 36th St., Charlotte, 28205, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.inkfloyd.com

Welcome to Ink Floyd, your direct connection to an extraordinary custom t-shirt screen printer! Our mission is simple - We find out what you want and we give it to you. We create valuable assets for your company by providing custom graphics and promotional items for consistent branding and heightened exposure in the marketplace. Further, we educate our customers on how to "stand out in crowd"​ which is so crucial to success in what can be the "sensory overload"​ of competing brands.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Marquis Book Printing

350 rue des Entrepreneurs, Montmagny, G5V 4T1, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.marquisbook.com

Established in 1937, Marquis, now a division of Lakeside Book Company , is offering integrated book printing and logistics solutions to thousands of content owners in Canada, the United States and Europe. The company operates three production plants in Montmagny, Louiseville and Toronto as well as a logistics centre in Ontario. It also includes a division specializing in the production of yearbooks and school agendas, Le Laurentien, and a division dedicated to graphic production. Marquis is a story of affinity and simplicity; due to the company's mastery of new technologies, its sense of innovation and its privileged relationships with our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 224
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ink-floyd-screen-printing.jpeg
Ink Floyd Screen Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marquis-imprimeur.jpeg
Marquis Book Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ink Floyd Screen Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Marquis Book Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ink Floyd Screen Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marquis Book Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Ink Floyd Screen Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ink Floyd Screen Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Marquis Book Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marquis Book Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ink-floyd-screen-printing.jpeg
Ink Floyd Screen Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marquis-imprimeur.jpeg
Marquis Book Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Marquis Book Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ink Floyd Screen Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Marquis Book Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ink Floyd Screen Printing company.

In the current year, Marquis Book Printing company and Ink Floyd Screen Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Marquis Book Printing company nor Ink Floyd Screen Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Marquis Book Printing company nor Ink Floyd Screen Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Marquis Book Printing company nor Ink Floyd Screen Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ink Floyd Screen Printing company nor Marquis Book Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ink Floyd Screen Printing nor Marquis Book Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ink Floyd Screen Printing company nor Marquis Book Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Marquis Book Printing company employs more people globally than Ink Floyd Screen Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Ink Floyd Screen Printing nor Marquis Book Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ink Floyd Screen Printing nor Marquis Book Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ink Floyd Screen Printing nor Marquis Book Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ink Floyd Screen Printing nor Marquis Book Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ink Floyd Screen Printing nor Marquis Book Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ink Floyd Screen Printing nor Marquis Book Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References