Comparison Overview

IngramSpark

VS

The Review

IngramSpark

14 Ingram Blvd, La Vergne, Tennessee, 37086, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://selfpub.is/2Pr2zdC

IngramSpark is the only publishing platform that delivers fully integrated print, digital, wholesale, and distribution services to the book industry through a single source. What does that mean? Once you finish and format your book we make it possible to share it with the world. A relationship with IngramSpark allows you to focus on your specialty—creating innovative content while we manage the dull stuff: printing, shipping and distribution.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Review

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thereviewcolorado.com

The Review is a monthly publication serving the advertising, marketing and media industries in Colorado and over 15 organizations involved. Three of these organizations carry their newsletters in the magazine including American Marketing Association, Business Marketing Association and Rocky Mountain Direct Marketing Association. Each month's issue includes a feature pertinent to the industry, News Notes and a monthly calendar of organization events.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingramspark.jpeg
IngramSpark
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-review.jpeg
The Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IngramSpark
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IngramSpark in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Review in 2025.

Incident History — IngramSpark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IngramSpark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingramspark.jpeg
IngramSpark
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-review.jpeg
The Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IngramSpark company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IngramSpark company.

In the current year, The Review company and IngramSpark company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Review company nor IngramSpark company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Review company nor IngramSpark company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Review company nor IngramSpark company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IngramSpark company nor The Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IngramSpark nor The Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither IngramSpark company nor The Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

IngramSpark company employs more people globally than The Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither IngramSpark nor The Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IngramSpark nor The Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IngramSpark nor The Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IngramSpark nor The Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IngramSpark nor The Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IngramSpark nor The Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References