Comparison Overview

Ingram Design Group

VS

A Ziemba Design

Ingram Design Group

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ingramdesigngroup.com

Ingram Design Group (IDG), led by Roy Ingram, offers a variety of marketing and communication design services specifically targeted to corporations, small businesses and other professional and social organizations. IDG will enhance your company’s professional image by customizing a marketing plan specific to your needs. We will work with you to create a unique, personal image to suit your organization – marketing materials, business plans, proposal development, annual reports, corporate capabilities, conference books, newsletters, brochures, multimedia presentations, web design, you name it. We listen carefully to your needs and produce consistent, high-quality services. We can help you plan your visual communications package and organize it every step of the way. We have the ability to offer state-of-the-art services to all our business clients. Services include: + Graphic Arts, + Web Design, + Photography, and + Marketing Consulting

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

A Ziemba Design

undefined, Portsmouth, NH, 03801, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749
http://www.aziembadesign.com

Creative solutions for start-ups in need of generating a brand presence. Supplemental design assistance for agencies and established businesses. The goal is to help clients build strong visual identities and create effective marketing materials. I equip each client with the tools they need to confidently promote and grow their business. Whether working with emerging companies or well-established brands, I bring the same level of creativity, adaptability, and strategic thinking to every project.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Ingram Design Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-ziemba-design.jpeg
A Ziemba Design
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ingram Design Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
A Ziemba Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ingram Design Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A Ziemba Design in 2025.

Incident History — Ingram Design Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ingram Design Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — A Ziemba Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A Ziemba Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Ingram Design Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-ziemba-design.jpeg
A Ziemba Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ingram Design Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A Ziemba Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, A Ziemba Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ingram Design Group company.

In the current year, A Ziemba Design company and Ingram Design Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither A Ziemba Design company nor Ingram Design Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither A Ziemba Design company nor Ingram Design Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither A Ziemba Design company nor Ingram Design Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ingram Design Group company nor A Ziemba Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ingram Design Group nor A Ziemba Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ingram Design Group company nor A Ziemba Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Ingram Design Group company and A Ziemba Design company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Ingram Design Group nor A Ziemba Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ingram Design Group nor A Ziemba Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ingram Design Group nor A Ziemba Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ingram Design Group nor A Ziemba Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ingram Design Group nor A Ziemba Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ingram Design Group nor A Ziemba Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References