Comparison Overview

ING

VS

ICICI Bank

ING

Bijlmerdreef 106, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1102 CT
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.ing.com

ING is a pioneer in digital banking and on the forefront as one of the most innovative banks in the world. As ING, we have a clear purpose that represents our conviction of people’s potential. We don’t judge, coach, or tell people how to live their lives. However big or small, modest or grand, we empower people and businesses to realise their vision for a better future. We made the promise to make banking frictionless, removing barriers to progress, and make people confident in their financial decisions. As a global bank we have a huge opportunity – and responsibility – to make an impact for the better. We can play a role by financing change, sharing knowledge, and innovating. Being sustainable is in all the choices we make—as a lender, as a partner and through the services we offer our customers

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 50,780
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ICICI Bank

ICICI Bank Towers, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Mumbai , Maharashtra, 400 051, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849
https://www.icicibank.com

ICICI Bank is one of India’s leading private sector banks, offering a wide range of banking products and services to corporate, Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) and individual customers across the country. The Bank offers multi-channel touch points including branches, ATMs, mobile banking, internet banking, and phone banking. The Bank has a network of 6,742 branches and 16,277 ATMs and cash recycling machines across India, as at December 31, 2024. For any assistance on products and services, please call ICICI Bank’s customer care number 1800 1080. Disclaimer: The content herein is only for information and does not amount to an offer, invitation or solicitation to buy or sell, and is not intended to create any rights or obligations. It is also not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or would subject ICICI Bank Limited (“ICICI Bank”) or its affiliate(s) to any licensing or registration requirements. Nothing contained herein is intended to constitute advice or opinion; please obtain professional advice before relying on any information contained herein. ICICI Bank disclaims any liability with respect to accuracy of information or any error or omission or any loss or damage incurred by anyone in reliance on the contents herein.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 164,277
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ing.jpeg
ING
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icici-bank.jpeg
ICICI Bank
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ING
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ICICI Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ING in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICICI Bank in 2025.

Incident History — ING (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ING cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ICICI Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICICI Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ing.jpeg
ING
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icici-bank.jpeg
ICICI Bank
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: ATM Network Processing
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ING company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ICICI Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ICICI Bank company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ING company has not reported any.

In the current year, ICICI Bank company and ING company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ICICI Bank company nor ING company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

ICICI Bank company has disclosed at least one data breach, while ING company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ICICI Bank company nor ING company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ING company nor ICICI Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ING nor ICICI Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ING company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ICICI Bank company.

ICICI Bank company employs more people globally than ING company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither ING nor ICICI Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ING nor ICICI Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ING nor ICICI Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ING nor ICICI Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ING nor ICICI Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ING nor ICICI Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References