Comparison Overview

ING

VS

Comerica Bank

ING

Bijlmerdreef 106, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1102 CT
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.ing.com

ING is a pioneer in digital banking and on the forefront as one of the most innovative banks in the world. As ING, we have a clear purpose that represents our conviction of people’s potential. We don’t judge, coach, or tell people how to live their lives. However big or small, modest or grand, we empower people and businesses to realise their vision for a better future. We made the promise to make banking frictionless, removing barriers to progress, and make people confident in their financial decisions. As a global bank we have a huge opportunity – and responsibility – to make an impact for the better. We can play a role by financing change, sharing knowledge, and innovating. Being sustainable is in all the choices we make—as a lender, as a partner and through the services we offer our customers

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 50,780
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Comerica Bank

1717 Main Street, Dallas, TX, US, 75201
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.comerica.com/

Comerica Incorporated (NYSE: CMA) is a financial services company headquartered in Dallas, Texas, strategically aligned by the Business Bank, the Retail Bank, and Wealth Management. The Business Bank provides companies of all sizes with an array of credit and non-credit financial products and services. The Retail Bank delivers personalized financial products and services to consumers. Wealth Management serves the needs of high net worth clients and institutions. Comerica’s approximately 8,000 colleagues focus on relationships, and helping people and businesses be successful. Comerica operates in seven of the 10 largest U.S. cities, with more than 430 banking centers in its primary markets of Texas, Arizona, California, Florida and Michigan. Select businesses operate in several other states, as well as in Canada and Mexico. Comerica is among the 25 largest U.S. banking companies. Visit Comerica's Facebook page at facebook.com/Comerica or on Twitter at @ComericaBank for more information on how Comerica is making a positive difference in the communities it serves. To learn more about Comerica’s products, services and career opportunities, visit Comerica.com.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 11,077
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ing.jpeg
ING
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comerica-bank.jpeg
Comerica Bank
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ING
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Comerica Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ING in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Comerica Bank in 2025.

Incident History — ING (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ING cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Comerica Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Comerica Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ing.jpeg
ING
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comerica-bank.jpeg
Comerica Bank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ING company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Comerica Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Comerica Bank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ING company.

In the current year, Comerica Bank company and ING company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Comerica Bank company nor ING company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Comerica Bank company nor ING company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Comerica Bank company nor ING company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ING company nor Comerica Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ING nor Comerica Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ING company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Comerica Bank company.

ING company employs more people globally than Comerica Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither ING nor Comerica Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ING nor Comerica Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ING nor Comerica Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ING nor Comerica Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ING nor Comerica Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ING nor Comerica Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References