Comparison Overview

ING

VS

Groupe BPCE

ING

Bijlmerdreef 106, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1102 CT
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.ing.com

ING is a pioneer in digital banking and on the forefront as one of the most innovative banks in the world. As ING, we have a clear purpose that represents our conviction of people’s potential. We don’t judge, coach, or tell people how to live their lives. However big or small, modest or grand, we empower people and businesses to realise their vision for a better future. We made the promise to make banking frictionless, removing barriers to progress, and make people confident in their financial decisions. As a global bank we have a huge opportunity – and responsibility – to make an impact for the better. We can play a role by financing change, sharing knowledge, and innovating. Being sustainable is in all the choices we make—as a lender, as a partner and through the services we offer our customers

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 50,780
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Groupe BPCE

7, Promenade Germaine Sablon, Paris, 75013, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-22
Between 750 and 799
https://groupebpce.com/

Groupe BPCE, at the service of its customers and the French economy Groupe BPCE pursues a full range of banking and insurance activities, working through its two major Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne cooperative banking networks and through its different subsidiaries. Groupe BPCE, the 2nd largest banking group in France, has put down deep roots in its local markets. Its 117,000 employees serve a total of 36 million customers, 8.6 of whom have decided to become cooperative shareholders. The Group’s different subsidiaries pursue their activities in banking and insurance, tailoring their services as closely as possible to the needs of the individuals and regions they serve. With a total of 19 Banque Populaire banks, 17 Caisses d’Epargne, Natixis, Crédit Foncier, Banque Palatine, etc., Groupe BPCE offers its customers a comprehensive range of products and services: savings and investment solutions, cash management services, financing solutions, insurance, and wholesale banking services. Faithful to its status as a cooperative banking institution, the Group accompanies its customers in the realization of their different projects and develops long-lasting relationships with them, thereby contributing 20% to the drive to finance the French economy.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 45,986
Subsidiaries: 44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ing.jpeg
ING
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bpce.jpeg
Groupe BPCE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ING
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Groupe BPCE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ING in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Groupe BPCE in 2025.

Incident History — ING (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ING cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Groupe BPCE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Groupe BPCE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ing.jpeg
ING
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bpce.jpeg
Groupe BPCE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ING company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Groupe BPCE company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Groupe BPCE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ING company.

In the current year, Groupe BPCE company and ING company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Groupe BPCE company nor ING company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Groupe BPCE company nor ING company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Groupe BPCE company nor ING company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ING company nor Groupe BPCE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ING nor Groupe BPCE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Groupe BPCE company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ING company.

ING company employs more people globally than Groupe BPCE company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither ING nor Groupe BPCE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ING nor Groupe BPCE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ING nor Groupe BPCE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ING nor Groupe BPCE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ING nor Groupe BPCE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ING nor Groupe BPCE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References