Comparison Overview

INFORNET

VS

ADATA Industrial

INFORNET

Cl Alonso Cano, 15, Arrecife, 35500, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-27

INFORNET es una organización especializada en la implantación de soluciones TIC, y en servicios de mantenimiento correctivo y preventivo. La empresa se ha consolidado como empresa de referencia en el sector de las tecnologías de la información. Su éxito se basa en la relación de confianza con sus clientes, al lograr el puesto de consejero y guía de sus TIC. El objetivo estratégico y global de INFORNET es utilizar la tecnología como un elemento de impulso y evolución para ayudar a las empresas a crecer en la Sociedad de la Información, y en definitiva, a mejorar la calidad y eficiencia de sus servicios. El conocimiento profundo del sector público y privado, además de sus procesos de negocio junto con toda la experiencia de INFORNET en el entorno tecnológico, coloca a la compañía en una situación única para convertirse en su socio de crecimiento.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 134
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ADATA Industrial

25F., No. 533, Tanmei St., Neihu Dist., Taipei City 114, Taipei, TW
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

As a global leader of industrial-grade memory, ADATA Industrial is devoted to provide durable and reliable industrial-grade storage products, including SSDs, memory cards, embedded storage products and DRAM modules to customers worldwide. We have a global presence and is able to offer high-quality technical and after services to customers regardless of geographic location. At the same time, ADATA Industrial is also able to leverage its R&D and manufacturing capabilities to provide customized products and solutions that meet the unique needs of individual customers. With its commitment to quality and innovation, ADATA Industrial is ready to serve the industrial sector with the widest range of memory solutions and work hand-in-hand with customers to create a better world and enrich lives. For more information, please visit industrial.adata.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infornet.jpeg
INFORNET
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adata-industrial.jpeg
ADATA Industrial
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
INFORNET
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ADATA Industrial
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INFORNET in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ADATA Industrial in 2025.

Incident History — INFORNET (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INFORNET cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ADATA Industrial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ADATA Industrial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infornet.jpeg
INFORNET
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adata-industrial.jpeg
ADATA Industrial
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data Theft, Extortion
Blog: Blog

FAQ

INFORNET company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ADATA Industrial company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ADATA Industrial company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas INFORNET company has not reported any.

In the current year, ADATA Industrial company and INFORNET company have not reported any cyber incidents.

ADATA Industrial company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while INFORNET company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ADATA Industrial company nor INFORNET company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ADATA Industrial company nor INFORNET company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither INFORNET company nor ADATA Industrial company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither INFORNET nor ADATA Industrial holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ADATA Industrial company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to INFORNET company.

INFORNET company employs more people globally than ADATA Industrial company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither INFORNET nor ADATA Industrial holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither INFORNET nor ADATA Industrial holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither INFORNET nor ADATA Industrial holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither INFORNET nor ADATA Industrial holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither INFORNET nor ADATA Industrial holds HIPAA certification.

Neither INFORNET nor ADATA Industrial holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H