Comparison Overview

Information Age

VS

The Scout Guide

Information Age

29 Clerkenwell Road, London, EC1M 5LA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Information Age was founded in 1995 as a print magazine. The brand launched a website in 2001 and evolved into a fully digital proposition in 2017. The Data Leadership Summit was launched in 2011, expanding into the awards event, together with the launch of the Tech Leaders Summit, the following year. The Tech Leaders Awards was launched in 2017. We support CTOs and technology leaders in managing the business critical issues that they are facing today, and in exploring and understanding the new technology innovations that will affect their businesses in the future.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Scout Guide

3465 Ivy Rd, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The Scout Guide (TSG) is a 100% women-founded and women-owned publishing franchise with 85+ locations nationwide—and growing! Launched in 2010 by Susie Matheson and Christy Ford, The Scout Guide began as a locally focused website and city guide dedicated to Charlottesville, Virginia. Since then, TSG has expanded nationwide, with editors/owners in each city serving as curators, storytellers, and small business advocates. At our headquarters in Charlottesville, VA, our national team shepherds our print guides through design and production and produces our online editorial content. We support over 3,000 small business owners, artists, artisans, dreamers, doers, and makers as a network. For more information on becoming a TSG franchisee, we invite you to visit franchise.thescoutguide.com. Headquartered in Charlottesville, VA, our national team shepherds our print guides through design and production and produces our online editorial content.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 178
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/information-age.jpeg
Information Age
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-scout-guide.jpeg
The Scout Guide
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Information Age
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Scout Guide
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Information Age in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Scout Guide in 2025.

Incident History — Information Age (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Information Age cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Scout Guide (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Scout Guide cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/information-age.jpeg
Information Age
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-scout-guide.jpeg
The Scout Guide
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Scout Guide company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Information Age company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Scout Guide company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Information Age company.

In the current year, The Scout Guide company and Information Age company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Scout Guide company nor Information Age company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Scout Guide company nor Information Age company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Scout Guide company nor Information Age company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Information Age company nor The Scout Guide company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Information Age nor The Scout Guide holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Information Age company nor The Scout Guide company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Scout Guide company employs more people globally than Information Age company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Information Age nor The Scout Guide holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Information Age nor The Scout Guide holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Information Age nor The Scout Guide holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Information Age nor The Scout Guide holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Information Age nor The Scout Guide holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Information Age nor The Scout Guide holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.