Comparison Overview

Infopress Group

VS

RPI Printing

Infopress Group

Strada Digului, Odorheiu Secuiesc, 535600, RO
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Infopress Group was founded in 1990 as the printer of the local newspaper in Odorheiu Secuiesc. In the years to have come IPG becomes a modern printing house specialized in high circulation catalogs and also magazines. In 1994, in the purpose of consolidating the commercial relations on the catalogs market we opened a new office in Bucharest. Four years later, in 1998, our constant efforts brought us to a well deserved reward, becoming the Romanian market leader, position hold to this day. As of 2001 we have continuously invested in modernization; we've bought the best machines and equipments, we have extended our production capabilities by acquiring and implementing the latest information management and pre-press. All this, together with the extension of our facilities with a new 4000 m2 production hall, transforms Infopress Group into an important company of the South - East European printing industry. In 2007 and 2008 we upgraded our technology, keeping in this way our leader position on the local market, for both the quality and the volume of the prints. In May 2010 the company of private equity GED acquired 92% of the capital of Infopress Group. GED is a European Private Equity firm operating in the small buyout and growth capital segment in the southeast Europe and the Iberian Peninsula, managing a total fund of investments of around € 350 million. With this acquisition, GED increases up to eight portfolio companies in Eastern Europe.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RPI Printing

135 Waldron Road, Fall River, MA, 02720, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Since 1988, RPI has been exceeding customer expectations. From short-run business card jobs to corporate brochures, projects with seemingly impossible deadlines to those with routine delivery requirements…every job is important. Our presses carry the best names in the industry: Komori & Xerox. But even the best equipment cannot ensure quality. It takes craftsmanship, experience and commitment to surpass industry standard. From estimation to delivery, every step in the process is designed to provide you with the best experience possible and to deliver a product to you that is above industry standard.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infopress-group.jpeg
Infopress Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rpi-printing.jpeg
RPI Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Infopress Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RPI Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Infopress Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RPI Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Infopress Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infopress Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RPI Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RPI Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infopress-group.jpeg
Infopress Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rpi-printing.jpeg
RPI Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Infopress Group company and RPI Printing company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, RPI Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Infopress Group company.

In the current year, RPI Printing company and Infopress Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RPI Printing company nor Infopress Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RPI Printing company nor Infopress Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RPI Printing company nor Infopress Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Infopress Group company nor RPI Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Infopress Group nor RPI Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Infopress Group company nor RPI Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RPI Printing company employs more people globally than Infopress Group company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Infopress Group nor RPI Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Infopress Group nor RPI Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Infopress Group nor RPI Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Infopress Group nor RPI Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Infopress Group nor RPI Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Infopress Group nor RPI Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N