Comparison Overview

Inetum

VS

Sopra Steria

Inetum

5, Rue Touzet Gaillard, St.-Ouen, Île-de-France, FR, 93400
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Inetum is a European leader in digital services. Inetum’s team of 27,000 consultants and specialists strive every day to make a digital impact for businesses, public sector entities and society. Inetum’s solutions aim at contributing to its clients’ performance and innovation as well as the common good. Present in 19 countries with a dense network of sites, Inetum partners with major software publishers to meet the challenges of digital transformation with proximity and flexibility. Driven by its ambition for growth and scale, Inetum generated sales of 2.4 billion euros in 2024. 🏅 Top Employer Europe 2025

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 16,633
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Sopra Steria

9 rue de Presbourg, None, Paris, France, FR, 75016
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 600 and 649

Sopra Steria, a major Tech player in Europe with 51,000 employees in nearly 30 countries, is recognised for its consulting, digital services and solutions. It helps its clients drive their digital transformation and obtain tangible and sustainable benefits. The Group provides end-to-end solutions to make large companies and organisations more competitive by combining in-depth knowledge of a wide range of business sectors and innovative technologies with a collaborative approach. Sopra Steria places people at the heart of everything it does and is committed to putting digital to work for its clients in order to build a positive future for all. In 2024, the Group generated revenues of €5.8 billion. The world is how we shape it

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 48,718
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inetum.jpeg
Inetum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soprasteria.jpeg
Sopra Steria
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Inetum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sopra Steria
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inetum in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Sopra Steria has 85.19% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Inetum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inetum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sopra Steria (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sopra Steria cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inetum.jpeg
Inetum
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soprasteria.jpeg
Sopra Steria
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Initial Access Broker
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Inetum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sopra Steria company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sopra Steria company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Inetum company.

In the current year, Sopra Steria company has reported more cyber incidents than Inetum company.

Both Sopra Steria company and Inetum company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Neither Sopra Steria company nor Inetum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sopra Steria company nor Inetum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Inetum company nor Sopra Steria company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Inetum nor Sopra Steria holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Inetum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sopra Steria company.

Sopra Steria company employs more people globally than Inetum company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Inetum nor Sopra Steria holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Inetum nor Sopra Steria holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Inetum nor Sopra Steria holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Inetum nor Sopra Steria holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Inetum nor Sopra Steria holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Inetum nor Sopra Steria holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H