Comparison Overview

Inetum

VS

DXC Technology

Inetum

5, Rue Touzet Gaillard, St.-Ouen, Île-de-France, FR, 93400
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Inetum is a European leader in digital services. Inetum’s team of 27,000 consultants and specialists strive every day to make a digital impact for businesses, public sector entities and society. Inetum’s solutions aim at contributing to its clients’ performance and innovation as well as the common good. Present in 19 countries with a dense network of sites, Inetum partners with major software publishers to meet the challenges of digital transformation with proximity and flexibility. Driven by its ambition for growth and scale, Inetum generated sales of 2.4 billion euros in 2024. 🏅 Top Employer Europe 2025

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 16,633
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

DXC Technology

20408 Bashan Dr, Ashburn, Virginia, 20147, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

DXC Technology (NYSE: DXC) helps global companies run their mission-critical systems and operations while modernizing IT, optimizing data architectures, and ensuring security and scalability across public, private and hybrid clouds. The world's largest companies and public sector organizations trust DXC to deploy services to drive new levels of performance, competitiveness, and customer experience across their IT estates. Learn more about how we deliver excellence for our customers and colleagues: https://www.dxc.com X: https://x.com/DXCTechnology Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/DXCTechnology Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dxctechnology

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 87,942
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inetum.jpeg
Inetum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dxctechnology.jpeg
DXC Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Inetum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DXC Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inetum in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DXC Technology in 2025.

Incident History — Inetum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inetum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DXC Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DXC Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inetum.jpeg
Inetum
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dxctechnology.jpeg
DXC Technology
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Inetum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DXC Technology company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Inetum company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas DXC Technology company has not reported any.

In the current year, DXC Technology company and Inetum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Inetum company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while DXC Technology company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DXC Technology company nor Inetum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DXC Technology company nor Inetum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Inetum company nor DXC Technology company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Inetum nor DXC Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Inetum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DXC Technology company.

DXC Technology company employs more people globally than Inetum company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Inetum nor DXC Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Inetum nor DXC Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Inetum nor DXC Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Inetum nor DXC Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Inetum nor DXC Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Inetum nor DXC Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H