Comparison Overview

Ineal

VS

KieTek

Ineal

SAO BERNARDO DO CAMPO, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Ineal Equipamentos Peripherals for Plastic Industry was founded in 1990 with 100% national manufacture of its products. With representation throughout the national territory and Latin America, Ineal is always offering quality and innovation to customers, with an excellent cost-benefit ratio. The success of our company's growth is explained by the loyalty of our employees, representatives and partners, who always seek solutions to meet the needs and satisfaction of our customers. Ineal has constantly sought to improve its equipment and its human capital to meet the demands of an increasingly competitive market. In this search we have highly qualified professionals who are attuned to new technologies and the evolution in the ways in which plastics are processed. Our customers are our greatest assets, their needs are our goals, we have Technical Sellers and representatives throughout the national territory, we are close to meet your requests and ready to indicate the best way, so that together we can transform your company and increase productivity by lowering costs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KieTek

22380 S. Scotland Ct., Queen Creek, Arizona, 85142, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Ball transfers & material handling systems. KieTek has been manufacturing ULD material handling systems for the aircargo industry for 18 years and counting. We have since evolved into material handling sytems for industries such as manufacturing, mining, cold storage, cargo & passenger van roller bed conversions. We also just released the first self contained free floating ball mat system. An industry first. Please check us out at www.kietek.com or www.globalspec.com to find out more.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ineal.jpeg
Ineal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kietek.jpeg
KieTek
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ineal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KieTek
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ineal in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KieTek in 2025.

Incident History — Ineal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ineal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KieTek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KieTek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ineal.jpeg
Ineal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kietek.jpeg
KieTek
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KieTek company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ineal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KieTek company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ineal company.

In the current year, KieTek company and Ineal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KieTek company nor Ineal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KieTek company nor Ineal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KieTek company nor Ineal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ineal company nor KieTek company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ineal nor KieTek holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ineal company nor KieTek company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

KieTek company employs more people globally than Ineal company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Ineal nor KieTek holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ineal nor KieTek holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ineal nor KieTek holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ineal nor KieTek holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ineal nor KieTek holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ineal nor KieTek holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H