Comparison Overview

ITC Inc.

VS

Zip-Bit, Inc.

ITC Inc.

Peoria, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

ITC, Inc. has over 15 years of experience supporting the manufacturing industry. Headquartered in Peoria, IL, ITC, Inc. provides services to manufacturing companies located in different parts of world. We work directly with the biggest machine tool builders and tooling providers, and have served Fortune 500 companies across different industries. Our expertise covers the whole spectrum of manufacturing development and execution. The ITC, Inc. team consists of highly specialized engineers and developers that have been recognized for the high level of quality and service. ITC, Inc. supports customers with successful introduction of new parts or machine tools, process improvement initiatives, cost reduction projects, system and software migration and upgrades, research and development, training, and more. ​ ITC, Inc. provides services in different areas of manufacturing including processing, programming, tool and fixture design, software and system development, machine installation and maintenance, shop support, and others. With on and off-site services ITC, Inc. has been able to adjust to the different needs of our customers across the different industries, provide cost effective and innovative solutions, and drive efficiency in manufacturing processes. Services include: - Manufacturing Engineering - Design Engineering - Programming and Processing - Software and Systems development - Industrial Maintenance Solutions Visit us at: www.itccnc.com/

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Zip-Bit, Inc.

20640 3rd Street, Saratoga, CA, 95070, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Taking Your Project into the 3rd Dimension Zip-Bit the 3D RAPID Prototype and Development Studio provides 3D Scanning (Structured Light & LASER), 3D (Surface / Solid / Parametric / Reverse Engineering) Modeling, and 3D Printing services for niche markets producing unique one off and limited run customized assemblies. Zip-Bit, Inc. realizes that there is a high demand for affordable specialized RAPID Prototype and Development services for all areas of the arts, education, industries, and sciences and is supporting that need... Just three easy steps to get a 3D Scan / 3D Model / 3D Print of an object: * Send a image or photo of the object in question - E-mail to Zip-Bit (the image/photo will be used to provide a quote for the 3D object) * Send the object (once the quote has been accepted) * Wait for your 3D model to arrive (you will receive the 3D Print plus the original)

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/industrial-technology-company-inc-.jpeg
ITC Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zip-bit-inc..jpeg
Zip-Bit, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ITC Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zip-Bit, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITC Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zip-Bit, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — ITC Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITC Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zip-Bit, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zip-Bit, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/industrial-technology-company-inc-.jpeg
ITC Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zip-bit-inc..jpeg
Zip-Bit, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ITC Inc. company and Zip-Bit, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Zip-Bit, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ITC Inc. company.

In the current year, Zip-Bit, Inc. company and ITC Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zip-Bit, Inc. company nor ITC Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zip-Bit, Inc. company nor ITC Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zip-Bit, Inc. company nor ITC Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ITC Inc. company nor Zip-Bit, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ITC Inc. nor Zip-Bit, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ITC Inc. company nor Zip-Bit, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ITC Inc. company employs more people globally than Zip-Bit, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither ITC Inc. nor Zip-Bit, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ITC Inc. nor Zip-Bit, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ITC Inc. nor Zip-Bit, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ITC Inc. nor Zip-Bit, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ITC Inc. nor Zip-Bit, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ITC Inc. nor Zip-Bit, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H