Comparison Overview

Industrial Angles 2.0

VS

Holstein International

Industrial Angles 2.0

Okhla Estate Marg, Phase 2 Industrial Area, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Industrial Angles is delivering the international standard quality contents & packaging and explores the dynamics of Major industries like Cement, Steel, Power and Minning , through industrial analysis, technology updates, personal interface & latest product review. Industrial Angles covers exclusive information on various international technologies, it has strong brand recall among the industry, thus has wide range of manufactures advertising to promote their products. It reaches directly at the doorstep of the key person of the targeted segment.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Holstein International

Harlingertrekweg 53, None, Leeuwarden, Friesland, NL, 8913 HR
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Holstein International - Monthly magazine for modern Holstein dairymen. Supplying unbiased information - worldwide accessible - to our readers, to enable them to improve their knowledge and the quality of their work within the Holstein industry(. The company Holstein International also publishes: Cattle Connection | Jersey International | Dairy Breeds International | Brown Swiss International | Beef on Dairy International | KuhFacto | HIPlus!

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/industrial-angles.jpeg
Industrial Angles 2.0
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holstein-international.jpeg
Holstein International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Industrial Angles 2.0
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Holstein International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Industrial Angles 2.0 in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holstein International in 2025.

Incident History — Industrial Angles 2.0 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Industrial Angles 2.0 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Holstein International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holstein International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/industrial-angles.jpeg
Industrial Angles 2.0
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holstein-international.jpeg
Holstein International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Industrial Angles 2.0 company and Holstein International company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Holstein International company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Industrial Angles 2.0 company.

In the current year, Holstein International company and Industrial Angles 2.0 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Holstein International company nor Industrial Angles 2.0 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Holstein International company nor Industrial Angles 2.0 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Holstein International company nor Industrial Angles 2.0 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Industrial Angles 2.0 company nor Holstein International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Industrial Angles 2.0 nor Holstein International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Industrial Angles 2.0 company nor Holstein International company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Holstein International company employs more people globally than Industrial Angles 2.0 company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Industrial Angles 2.0 nor Holstein International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Industrial Angles 2.0 nor Holstein International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Industrial Angles 2.0 nor Holstein International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Industrial Angles 2.0 nor Holstein International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Industrial Angles 2.0 nor Holstein International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Industrial Angles 2.0 nor Holstein International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.