Comparison Overview

Indus Hospitality Group

VS

DoubleTree by Hilton

Indus Hospitality Group

950 Panorama Trail S, Rochester, New York, 14625, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Indus Hospitality Group owns and operates more than 50 properties, primarily hotels and restaurants in the Rochester, Finger Lakes and Western New York regions. Indus is family-owned and in its third decade of operation, having formed in 1988. There are currently more than 800 people working for the company and the corporate offices are based in Pittsford, N.Y., a suburb of Rochester. The team at Indus Hospitality Group has been recognized numerous times as first-class operators, earning national and regional awards, including the Dunkinโ€™ Brands Rising Star of the Year, the Microtel Inn & Suites Franchisee of the Year Award, the Hilton Worldwide Lighthouse Award and TripAdvisor Awards for Excellence.

NAICS: 721
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 100
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DoubleTree by Hilton

7930 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

DoubleTree by Hilton hotels are distinctively designed properties that provide true comfort to todayโ€™s business and leisure travelers. From the millions of delighted hotel guests who are welcomed with the brandโ€™s legendary, warm chocolate chip cookies at check-in to the advantages of the award-winning Hilton HHonorsยฎ guest reward program, each DoubleTree by Hilton guest receives a satisfying stay wherever their travels take them. With a growing collection of contemporary, upscale accommodations in more than 375+ gateway cities, metropolitan areas and vacation destinations worldwide. DoubleTree by Hilton is part of Hilton Worldwide (NYSE: HLT), a leading global hospitality company spanning the lodging sector from luxury and full-service hotels and resorts to extended-stay suites and focused-service hotels. For 95 years, Hilton Worldwide has been dedicated to continuing its tradition of providing exceptional guest experiences. The companyโ€™s portfolio of eleven world-class global brands is comprised of more than 4,100 managed, franchised, owned and leased hotels and timeshare properties, with more than 685,000 rooms in 92 countries and territories, including Hilton Hotels & Resorts, Waldorf Astoria Hotels & Resorts, Conrad Hotels & Resorts, Curio โ€“ A Collection by Hilton, DoubleTree by Hilton, Embassy Suites Hotels, Hilton Garden Inn, Hampton Hotels, Homewood Suites by Hilton, Home2 Suites by Hilton and Hilton Grand Vacations. The company also manages an award-winning customer loyalty program, Hilton Honors.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 15,099
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indus-hospitality-group.jpeg
Indus Hospitality Group
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doubletree-hilton.jpeg
DoubleTree by Hilton
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Indus Hospitality Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DoubleTree by Hilton
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indus Hospitality Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DoubleTree by Hilton in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Indus Hospitality Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indus Hospitality Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” DoubleTree by Hilton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DoubleTree by Hilton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indus-hospitality-group.jpeg
Indus Hospitality Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doubletree-hilton.jpeg
DoubleTree by Hilton
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: denial-of-service malware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Point-of-Sale System
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Indus Hospitality Group company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to DoubleTree by Hilton company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

DoubleTree by Hilton company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Indus Hospitality Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, DoubleTree by Hilton company and Indus Hospitality Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DoubleTree by Hilton company nor Indus Hospitality Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

DoubleTree by Hilton company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Indus Hospitality Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DoubleTree by Hilton company nor Indus Hospitality Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Indus Hospitality Group company nor DoubleTree by Hilton company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

DoubleTree by Hilton company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Indus Hospitality Group company.

DoubleTree by Hilton company employs more people globally than Indus Hospitality Group company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X