Comparison Overview

Indus Hospitality Group

VS

Country Club

Indus Hospitality Group

950 Panorama Trail S, Rochester, New York, 14625, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Indus Hospitality Group owns and operates more than 50 properties, primarily hotels and restaurants in the Rochester, Finger Lakes and Western New York regions. Indus is family-owned and in its third decade of operation, having formed in 1988. There are currently more than 800 people working for the company and the corporate offices are based in Pittsford, N.Y., a suburb of Rochester. The team at Indus Hospitality Group has been recognized numerous times as first-class operators, earning national and regional awards, including the Dunkinโ€™ Brands Rising Star of the Year, the Microtel Inn & Suites Franchisee of the Year Award, the Hilton Worldwide Lighthouse Award and TripAdvisor Awards for Excellence.

NAICS: 721
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 100
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Country Club

Country Club (India) Ltd "Country Club Kool", 4th & 5th Floor Begumpet, Hyderabad 500016, IN
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Country Club India Ltd is one of the fastest growing entertainment and leisure conglomerate in India. A Multi-Million dollar entity and a listed company on BSE (Bombay Stock Exchange), CCIL is a pioneer in the concept of family clubbing in the country. CCIL has established 205 properties of which 50 are owned and 155 are franchised properties. Presently it has 172 plus affiliations plus a global gateway via Country Vacations and RCI affiliation of 4000 resorts for its esteemed members. CCIL's very first leisure infrastructure project is Country Club Coconut Grove which is over much 100 acre and completely eco friendly project near Tumkur Bangalore. The Project a resultant of a synergy between the core expertise of the founding organization Amrutha Estates and the innovative vision of participatory clubbing; that hinges on community living and holiday homes with clubbing pleasures. CCIL also forays into the global world with a futuristic project - The proposed Country Club Golf Village is all set to revolutionize the face of the industry, Golf Village is a premium membership concept for the niche lifestyle segmen

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indus-hospitality-group.jpeg
Indus Hospitality Group
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/country-club.jpeg
Country Club
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Indus Hospitality Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Country Club
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indus Hospitality Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Country Club in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Indus Hospitality Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indus Hospitality Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Country Club (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Country Club cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indus-hospitality-group.jpeg
Indus Hospitality Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/country-club.jpeg
Country Club
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Indus Hospitality Group company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Country Club company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Country Club company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Indus Hospitality Group company.

In the current year, Country Club company and Indus Hospitality Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Country Club company nor Indus Hospitality Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Country Club company nor Indus Hospitality Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Country Club company nor Indus Hospitality Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Indus Hospitality Group company nor Country Club company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Indus Hospitality Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Country Club company.

Indus Hospitality Group company employs more people globally than Country Club company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X