Comparison Overview

inDrive

VS

Oracle

inDrive

Mountain View, 94040, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.inDrive.com

inDrive is a global mobility and urban services platform. The inDrive app has been downloaded over 360 million times, and has been the second most downloaded mobility app for the third consecutive year. In addition to ride-hailing, inDrive provides an expanding list of urban services, including intercity transportation and delivery. In 2023, inDrive launched New Ventures, a venture and M&A arm. inDrive operates in 982 cities in 48 countries. Driven by its mission of challenging social injustice, the company is committed to having a positive impact on the lives of one billion people by 2030. It pursues this goal both through its core business, which supports local communities via a fair pricing model; and through the work of inVision, its non-profit arm. inVision’s community empowerment programs help to advance education, sports, arts and sciences, gender equality and other vital initiatives. For more information visit www.inDrive.com

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,185
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Oracle

2300 Oracle Way, Austin, Texas, US, 78741
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 0 and 549
http://www.oracle.com

We’re a cloud technology company that provides organizations around the world with computing infrastructure and software to help them innovate, unlock efficiencies and become more effective. We also created the world’s first – and only – autonomous database to help organize and secure our customers’ data. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers higher performance, security, and cost savings. It is designed so businesses can move workloads easily from on-premises systems to the cloud, and between cloud and on-premises and other clouds. Oracle Cloud applications provide business leaders with modern applications that help them innovate, attain sustainable growth, and become more resilient. The work we do is not only transforming the world of business--it's helping defend governments, and advance scientific and medical research. From nonprofits to companies of all sizes, millions of people use our tools to streamline supply chains, make HR more human, quickly pivot to a new financial plan, and connect data and people around the world. At work, we embrace diversity, encourage personal and professional growth, and celebrate a global team of passionate people developing innovative technologies that help people and companies tackle real-world problems head-on. If you’d like to join us, please visit our Careers page: https://www.oracle.com/corporate/careers/ For investor news, SEC filings, and financial information about Oracle (NYSE:ORCL), please visit https://investor.oracle.com/home/. Follow us on X: x.com/oracle Like our page on Facebook: facebook.com/Oracle/ Follow us on Instagram: instagram.com/oracle/

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 197,946
Subsidiaries: 33
12-month incidents
9
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indrive.jpeg
inDrive
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oracle.jpeg
Oracle
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
inDrive
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oracle
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for inDrive in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Oracle has 1132.88% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — inDrive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

inDrive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oracle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oracle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indrive.jpeg
inDrive
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oracle.jpeg
Oracle
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing, Software Vulnerability Exploitation
Motivation: Financial Gain, Espionage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Critical Vulnerability in Oracle’s E-Business Suite
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption of Healthcare Services, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: malicious advertisements (malvertising), typosquatted domains, fake login pages, social engineering
Motivation: financial gain, data theft, fraud (e.g., unauthorized bookings), sale of credentials on dark web
Blog: Blog

FAQ

inDrive company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oracle company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Oracle company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas inDrive company has not reported any.

In the current year, Oracle company has reported more cyber incidents than inDrive company.

Oracle company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while inDrive company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Oracle company has disclosed at least one data breach, while inDrive company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Oracle company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while inDrive company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Oracle company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while inDrive company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither inDrive nor Oracle holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Oracle company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to inDrive company.

Oracle company employs more people globally than inDrive company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither inDrive nor Oracle holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither inDrive nor Oracle holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither inDrive nor Oracle holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither inDrive nor Oracle holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither inDrive nor Oracle holds HIPAA certification.

Neither inDrive nor Oracle holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References