Comparison Overview

inDrive

VS

CenturyLink

inDrive

Mountain View, 94040, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.inDrive.com

inDrive is a global mobility and urban services platform. The inDrive app has been downloaded over 360 million times, and has been the second most downloaded mobility app for the third consecutive year. In addition to ride-hailing, inDrive provides an expanding list of urban services, including intercity transportation and delivery. In 2023, inDrive launched New Ventures, a venture and M&A arm. inDrive operates in 982 cities in 48 countries. Driven by its mission of challenging social injustice, the company is committed to having a positive impact on the lives of one billion people by 2030. It pursues this goal both through its core business, which supports local communities via a fair pricing model; and through the work of inVision, its non-profit arm. inVision’s community empowerment programs help to advance education, sports, arts and sciences, gender equality and other vital initiatives. For more information visit www.inDrive.com

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,185
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CenturyLink

100 CenturyLink Drive, Monroe, LA, 71201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.centurylink.com

CenturyLink (NYSE: CTL) is a technology leader delivering hybrid networking, cloud connectivity, and security solutions to customers around the world. Through its extensive global fiber network, CenturyLink provides secure and reliable services to meet the growing digital demands of businesses and consumers. CenturyLink strives to be the trusted connection to the networked world and is focused on delivering technology that enhances the customer experience. Learn more at http://news.centurylink.com/.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 24,839
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indrive.jpeg
inDrive
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centurylink.jpeg
CenturyLink
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
inDrive
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CenturyLink
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for inDrive in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CenturyLink in 2025.

Incident History — inDrive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

inDrive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CenturyLink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CenturyLink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indrive.jpeg
inDrive
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centurylink.jpeg
CenturyLink
Incidents
Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
Date Detected: 8/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Password Guessing Attack
Blog: Blog
Date Detected: 10/2019
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

inDrive company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CenturyLink company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CenturyLink company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas inDrive company has not reported any.

In the current year, CenturyLink company and inDrive company have not reported any cyber incidents.

CenturyLink company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while inDrive company has not reported such incidents publicly.

CenturyLink company has disclosed at least one data breach, while inDrive company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CenturyLink company nor inDrive company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither inDrive company nor CenturyLink company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither inDrive nor CenturyLink holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CenturyLink company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to inDrive company.

CenturyLink company employs more people globally than inDrive company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither inDrive nor CenturyLink holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither inDrive nor CenturyLink holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither inDrive nor CenturyLink holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither inDrive nor CenturyLink holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither inDrive nor CenturyLink holds HIPAA certification.

Neither inDrive nor CenturyLink holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References