Comparison Overview

Indra

VS

NTT DATA, Inc.

Indra

Avda. Bruselas, 35, Alcobendas, Madrid, Madrid, ES, 28108
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Indra (www.indracompany.com) is one of the leading global defence, aerospace and technology companies, and a world leader in digital transformation and information technologies in Spain and Latin America through its subsidiary, Minsait. Its business model is based on a comprehensive range of proprietary products, with high-value approach and a significant innovative component, making it the technological partner for the digitalization and key operations of its clients around the world. Sustainability forms part of its strategy and culture in order to overcome current-day and future social and environmental challenges. In the 2023 fiscal year, Indra achieved revenue totaling €4.343 billion, with more than 57,000 employees, a local presence in 46 countries and business operations in over 140 countries.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 38,194
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NTT DATA, Inc.

undefined, Tokyo, undefined, undefined, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

NTT DATA, Inc. is a trusted global innovator of business and technology services. We're committed to helping clients innovate, optimize and transform for long-term success. Our R&D investments help organizations and society move confidently and sustainably into the digital future. As a Global Top Employer, we have diverse experts in more than 50 countries and a robust partner ecosystem of established and start-up companies. Our services include business and technology consulting, data and artificial intelligence, industry solutions, as well as the development, implementation and management of applications, infrastructure, and connectivity.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 58,499
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indra.jpeg
Indra
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-ntt.jpeg
NTT DATA, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Indra
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NTT DATA, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indra in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NTT DATA, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Indra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NTT DATA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NTT DATA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indra.jpeg
Indra
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-ntt.jpeg
NTT DATA, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromise of Order Information Distribution System
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploiting exposed/hard-coded credentials in cloud/source code repositories (AWS, Bitbucket, GitHub), Insider-assisted access, Weak network segmentation, Third-party vendor compromises (e.g., TMS, WMS, EDI systems), Staged data leaks for extortion pressure
Motivation: Financial Gain (Extortion), Reputational Damage, Operational Disruption (via data leaks)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NTT DATA, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Indra company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NTT DATA, Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Indra company has not reported any.

In the current year, NTT DATA, Inc. company has reported more cyber incidents than Indra company.

Neither NTT DATA, Inc. company nor Indra company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

NTT DATA, Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Indra company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NTT DATA, Inc. company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Indra company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Indra company nor NTT DATA, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Indra nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NTT DATA, Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Indra company.

NTT DATA, Inc. company employs more people globally than Indra company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Indra nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Indra nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Indra nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Indra nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Indra nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Indra nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X