Comparison Overview

Indigo River Publishing

VS

Suffolk University Law Review

Indigo River Publishing

3 W Garden St, Pensacola, Florida, 32502, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://indigoriverpublishing.com

| Indigo River Publishing: A Modern Publisher for Today’s Authors | Founded in 2012, Indigo River Publishing is a dynamic independent publisher dedicated to empowering voices across every genre. We proudly work with both internationally acclaimed executives and celebrities as well as promising debut authors. At Indigo River, we identify and nurture new talent, pushing the boundaries of traditional publishing by prioritizing partnership and transparency. Our modern approach keeps the best of traditional publishing—seasoned editors, award-winning designers, and robust distribution—while discarding outdated practices. Indigo River’s author-centered business model fosters true partnership, allowing authors an active role in decisions that shape their work. We champion transparency at every step, from standardized royalty rates to collaborative sessions for cover design and integrated marketing planning. At Indigo River, everyone has a seat at the table. Indigo River authors enjoy high-level editorial guidance, comprehensive marketing support, and distribution across all formats. Our partnership with Simon & Schuster distribution services elevates our reach to over 38,000 retailers worldwide. This collaboration connects our titles with book buyers across major outlets, including independent bookstores, airport stores, and popular retailers like Barnes & Noble, Target, and Costco. At Indigo River Publishing, we don’t just publish books; we build enduring partnerships that allow authors to thrive in today’s evolving publishing landscape.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Suffolk University Law Review

120 Tremont St, 430, Boston, Massachusetts, US, 02108
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749
http://suffolklawreview.org

The Suffolk University Law Review is a student-edited legal periodical published four times each year. The Law Review’s objective is to advance legal education and the legal profession through quality legal commentary and high publication standards. With this goal in mind, the Law Review strives to advance the growing reputation of Suffolk University Law School. Designed primarily as a research tool for the judiciary, practitioners, scholars, and students, the Law Review contains both professionally-authored and student-authored works. Each issue of the Suffolk University Law Review is divided between works written by professionals and students. Professional contributions are in the form of Lead Articles. Lead Articles, written by prominent jurists, legal scholars, and practitioners, vary greatly in topic and scope. Student-written works include Notes and Case Comments. A Note is an in-depth analysis of a particular field of law and usually concludes by suggesting how the courts should decide future cases or by proposing new legislation. A Case Comment describes and analyzes a recent important appellate court decision and concludes by offering opinions as to the decision’s probable impact on future cases. Law reviews are the principal medium through which new legal thought and authoritative opinion are presented to the profession. Among all the fields of graduate studies, law reviews are unique because they are edited and produced by students, with minimal faculty oversight. The policy of Suffolk University Law School, its deans, and its faculty is to delegate to the Law Review the greatest possible degree of responsibility and autonomy in connection with its publication. The Suffolk University Law Review appreciates the guidance of its faculty advisors, Professors Stephen M. McJohn and John Infranca.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indigo-river-publishing.jpeg
Indigo River Publishing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suffolk-university-law-review.jpeg
Suffolk University Law Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Indigo River Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Suffolk University Law Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indigo River Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Suffolk University Law Review in 2025.

Incident History — Indigo River Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indigo River Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Suffolk University Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Suffolk University Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indigo-river-publishing.jpeg
Indigo River Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suffolk-university-law-review.jpeg
Suffolk University Law Review
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Indigo River Publishing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Suffolk University Law Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Suffolk University Law Review company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Indigo River Publishing company has not reported any.

In the current year, Suffolk University Law Review company and Indigo River Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Suffolk University Law Review company nor Indigo River Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Suffolk University Law Review company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Indigo River Publishing company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Suffolk University Law Review company nor Indigo River Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Indigo River Publishing company nor Suffolk University Law Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Indigo River Publishing nor Suffolk University Law Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Indigo River Publishing company nor Suffolk University Law Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Indigo River Publishing company employs more people globally than Suffolk University Law Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Indigo River Publishing nor Suffolk University Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Indigo River Publishing nor Suffolk University Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Indigo River Publishing nor Suffolk University Law Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Indigo River Publishing nor Suffolk University Law Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Indigo River Publishing nor Suffolk University Law Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Indigo River Publishing nor Suffolk University Law Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References