Comparison Overview

IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd)

VS

gategourmet

IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd)

Level 1, Tower C, Global Business Park,, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122 002, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

How time flies. #18YearsOfIndiGo IndiGo is India’s largest passenger airline. We primarily operate in India’s domestic air travel market as a low-cost carrier with focus on our three pillars – offering low fares, being on-time and delivering a courteous and hassle-free experience. IndiGo has become synonymous with being on-time. Since our inception in August 2006, we have grown from a carrier with one plane to a fleet of 300+ aircraft today. A uniform fleet for each type of operation, high operational reliability and an award winning service make us one of the most reliable airlines in the world. IndiGo has a total destination count of 100+ destinations with 80+ domestic destinations and 30+ International destinations.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 31,967
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

gategourmet

Glattbrugg, CH
Last Update: 2025-11-27

gategourmet has been serving the airline industry for more than 70 years and has become the world’s largest independent provider of airline catering and logistics. We prepare tens of thousands of tasty, nutritious passenger meals and snacks daily and reliably service more than 2 million flights a year in “last mile” operations worldwide. gategourmet is the core business behind gategroup, the leading independent global provider of products, services and solutions related to an airline passenger’s onboard experience. Our 27,000 employees work to serve people on the move with their expertise in catering and hospitality, provisioning and logistics, and onboard solutions. We serve over 250 carriers in more than 30 countries and provide our customers with expertise and solutions tailored to their guests, service offerings, and geographic regions.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 10,643
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indigo-airlines.jpeg
IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gate-gourmet.jpeg
gategourmet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
gategourmet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for gategourmet in 2025.

Incident History — IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — gategourmet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

gategourmet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indigo-airlines.jpeg
IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gate-gourmet.jpeg
gategourmet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to gategourmet company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, gategourmet company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) company.

In the current year, gategourmet company and IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither gategourmet company nor IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither gategourmet company nor IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither gategourmet company nor IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) company nor gategourmet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) nor gategourmet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

gategourmet company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) company.

IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) company employs more people globally than gategourmet company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) nor gategourmet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) nor gategourmet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) nor gategourmet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) nor gategourmet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) nor gategourmet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) nor gategourmet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H