Comparison Overview

Indicator

VS

Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

Indicator

Schootensedreef 31, Helmond, Noord-Brabant, 5708 HZ, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Indicator publiceert als onafhankelijk uitgever tips en adviezen voor het midden- en kleinbedrijf. Deze adviezen voldoen steeds aan dezelfde basisprincipes: kort en kernachtig, in heldere en duidelijke taal en onmiddellijk toepasbaar in de praktijk. Geen grootse theorieën, maar to-the-point adviezen gefilterd uit een overvloed van informatie, veranderende wetgeving, rechtspraak, praktijkgevallen en wetenschappelijk onderzoek. Met deze adviezen kunnen ondernemers, vrije beroepers, leidinggevenden en adviseurs maximaal voordeel behalen voor hun bedrijf.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine is an online publication dedicated to those who love model trains. MRH is entirely ad supported and FREE to readers. The first issue of MRH was published in January 2009. MRH has moved to monthly publication in 2011. Our current circulation is estimated at 30,000+ (the Nov 2010 issue is around 35,000). We welcome inquiries regarding advertising in our publication and on our website. We also encourage third party authors to submit article proposals - we pay upon acceptance of such material.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indicator.jpeg
Indicator
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Indicator
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indicator in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine in 2025.

Incident History — Indicator (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indicator cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indicator.jpeg
Indicator
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Indicator company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Indicator company.

In the current year, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine company and Indicator company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine company nor Indicator company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine company nor Indicator company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine company nor Indicator company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Indicator company nor Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Indicator nor Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Indicator company nor Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Indicator company employs more people globally than Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Indicator nor Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Indicator nor Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Indicator nor Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Indicator nor Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Indicator nor Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Indicator nor Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.