Comparison Overview

IFLS Library System

VS

BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project

IFLS Library System

1538 Truax Boulevard, Eau Claire, WI, 54703, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

IFLS is a state-funded organization encompassing 53 public libraries and 3 county library services in 10 west central Wisconsin counties. Founded in 1978, IFLS operates to promote libraries and access to library services. This is done by providing System Library Directors with consulting, advocacy, public relations, continuing education, courier and delivery, design, interlibrary loan, internet access, and youth services. IFLS also hosts the MORE shared system.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project

PO Box 21206, Charleston, South Carolina, 29413, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Through Lyrasis (a non-profit, community-focused membership organization), our community engagement tools help support libraries and their community to create, share, and discover local content. Create. Whether it is a multimedia collection or a professional-quality eBook, tools like Creator and Pressbooks Public help your library create unique local content, by and for your community. Share. Use Custom Submission Pages to invite patrons to share content for your library’s community collections. Encourage your local writing community to share their ebooks with the Indie Author Project to gain new readership and exposure through the library. Discover. With geolocation authentication, your patrons can have instant access to all of your BiblioBoard Library content in an unlimited, simultaneous-use environment.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianhead-federated-library-system.jpeg
IFLS Library System
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bibliolabs.jpeg
BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IFLS Library System
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IFLS Library System in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project in 2025.

Incident History — IFLS Library System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IFLS Library System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianhead-federated-library-system.jpeg
IFLS Library System
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bibliolabs.jpeg
BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IFLS Library System company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IFLS Library System company.

In the current year, BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company and IFLS Library System company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company nor IFLS Library System company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company nor IFLS Library System company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company nor IFLS Library System company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IFLS Library System company nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IFLS Library System nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither IFLS Library System company nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

IFLS Library System company employs more people globally than BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither IFLS Library System nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IFLS Library System nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IFLS Library System nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IFLS Library System nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IFLS Library System nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IFLS Library System nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H