Comparison Overview

Indian Bank

VS

Bank of China

Indian Bank

254-260, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN, 600 014
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://indianbank.bank.in/

Established in 1907, today, we are a family of over 141 million customers and 40000 staff members. With a 100% CBS network of 6000+ branches and 5400+ ATMs and BNAs, Indian Bank has a wide national footprint, besides foreign branches in Singapore and Colombo, along with arrangements with 640 Overseas Correspondent Banks present in 77 countries. We strive continuously to provide the best banking solutions to the people/units from all possible sectors including Corporate, Retail, Institutional, Agriculture, MSME, SHG, and NRIs. Choose from our wide range of products spanning Deposits, Loans, Cards, Wallets, Apps, Insurance, Mutual Funds, Remittances, Forex services and more. For information, visit https://indianbank.bank.in/ Further, you can send feedback at [email protected]

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 15,649
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Bank of China

Bank of China Head Office Building, Beijing, undefined, 100818, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849
http://www.boc.cn

Bank of China, include BOC Hong Kong, BOC International, BOCG Insurance and other financial institutions, providing a comprehensive range of high-quality financial services to individual and corporate customers as well as financial institutions worldwide. Over the past century, Bank of China played an important role in China’s financial history. It was established in 1912 pursuant to the approval of DR. Sun Yat-sen. In the following 37 years the Bank served as the central bank, international exchange bank and specialized foreign trade bank successively. In 1949, Bank of China became the state-designated specialized foreign exchange bank. In 2003, it was named by the State Council as one of the pilot banks for joint-stock reform of wholly state-owned commercial banks. On August 26, 2004, Bank of China Limited was formally incorporated in Beijing as a state-controlled joint stock commercial bank. Bank of China is the most internationalized commercial bank in China. BOC London Branch, the first overseas branch of the Chinese banks, was established in 1929. Currently, it had over 10000 domestic operations and over 600 overseas operations. In 1994 and 1995, Bank of China became the note issuing bank in Hong Kong and Macao respectively. The Bank prepared a new strategic development plan which was approved by the Board of Directors in March 2009. Strategic Positioning: To be a large multinational banking group based on a diversified and integrated cross-border business platform, with a core business of commercial banking. Strategic Goals: To be a leading international bank delivering growth and excellence.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 22,584
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianbank.jpeg
Indian Bank
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-of-china.jpeg
Bank of China
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Indian Bank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bank of China
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indian Bank in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bank of China in 2025.

Incident History — Indian Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indian Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bank of China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bank of China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianbank.jpeg
Indian Bank
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-of-china.jpeg
Bank of China
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bank of China company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Indian Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Indian Bank company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bank of China company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bank of China company and Indian Bank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bank of China company nor Indian Bank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Indian Bank company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Bank of China company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bank of China company nor Indian Bank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Indian Bank company nor Bank of China company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Indian Bank nor Bank of China holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Indian Bank company nor Bank of China company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bank of China company employs more people globally than Indian Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Indian Bank nor Bank of China holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Indian Bank nor Bank of China holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Indian Bank nor Bank of China holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Indian Bank nor Bank of China holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Indian Bank nor Bank of China holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Indian Bank nor Bank of China holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References