Comparison Overview

Indianapolis Zoo

VS

Honolulu Museum of Art

Indianapolis Zoo

1200 W. Washington Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46222, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Opened in 1964, the Indianapolis Zoo is the largest privately funded zoo in the nation. Located near downtown in White River State Park since 1988, the 93-acre Zoo was the first to be triple accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and the American Alliance of Museums as a zoo, an aquarium and a botanic garden. Hosting more than a million visitors annually, the Zoo has also emerged as a global leader in animal conservation and research, receiving international recognition for work with conservation and breeding programs including the world’s first successful artificial insemination of an African elephant. Funding from the Indianapolis Zoo also supports the efforts of animal conservation organizations around the globe. At the Zoo, guests can connect year-round with nearly 1,300 animals within living habitats that closely resemble their native regions of the globe. The beautiful 3.3-acre White River Gardens is also part of the Zoo and continues its tradition of connecting animals, plants and people.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 374
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Honolulu Museum of Art

900 S Beretania St, None, Honolulu, HI, US, 96814
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

The Honolulu Museum of Art is a unique gathering place where art, global worldviews, culture, and education converge right in the heart of Honolulu, and a vital part of Hawaiʻi’s cultural landscape. In addition to international-caliber temporary exhibitions, the museum features an extensive permanent collection, an art school, an independent art house theatre, and a cafe, all housed within one of the most beautiful and iconic buildings in Honolulu.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 131
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianapolis-zoological-society.jpeg
Indianapolis Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/honolulu-museum-of-art.jpeg
Honolulu Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Indianapolis Zoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Honolulu Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indianapolis Zoo in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Honolulu Museum of Art in 2025.

Incident History — Indianapolis Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indianapolis Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Honolulu Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Honolulu Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianapolis-zoological-society.jpeg
Indianapolis Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/honolulu-museum-of-art.jpeg
Honolulu Museum of Art
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Indianapolis Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Honolulu Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Honolulu Museum of Art company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Indianapolis Zoo company has not reported any.

In the current year, Honolulu Museum of Art company and Indianapolis Zoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Honolulu Museum of Art company nor Indianapolis Zoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Honolulu Museum of Art company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Indianapolis Zoo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Honolulu Museum of Art company nor Indianapolis Zoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo company nor Honolulu Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo nor Honolulu Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo company nor Honolulu Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Indianapolis Zoo company employs more people globally than Honolulu Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo nor Honolulu Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo nor Honolulu Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo nor Honolulu Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo nor Honolulu Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo nor Honolulu Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo nor Honolulu Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X