Comparison Overview

Indian Valley Public Library

VS

Idaho Commission for Libraries

Indian Valley Public Library

100 E Church Ave, Telford, PA, 18969, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Indian Valley Public Library, 100 East Church Ave, Telford PA 18969. The IVPL reflects our Indian Valley community. We value the positive impact our public library has on our children. We value literacy and promoting a love of reading. We value respect for each individual person and recognize the need to serve all. We value community and the potential for our library to strengthen our democracy by inviting civic engagement and civil discussions. The library serves five communities of the Souderton Area School District: Franconia, Lower Salford, Salford, Souderton, and Telford. IVPL is an independent member of the Montgomery County Library District. As an Access PA participant, the library serves all Pennsylvania residents under the Access-PA program.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Idaho Commission for Libraries

325 West State Street, Boise, Idaho, 83702, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

The Idaho Commission for Libraries (ICfL) is an agency of the State of Idaho. Our mission is to assist libraries to build the capacity to better serve their communities. We offer a variety of resources for libraries and Idahoans. To learn more about ICfL, programs located at your local library, or resources available through us, please follow our page and visit our website at libraries.idaho.gov.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indian-valley-public-library.jpeg
Indian Valley Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idaho-commission-for-libraries.jpeg
Idaho Commission for Libraries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Indian Valley Public Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Idaho Commission for Libraries
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indian Valley Public Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Idaho Commission for Libraries in 2025.

Incident History — Indian Valley Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indian Valley Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Idaho Commission for Libraries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Idaho Commission for Libraries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indian-valley-public-library.jpeg
Indian Valley Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idaho-commission-for-libraries.jpeg
Idaho Commission for Libraries
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Indian Valley Public Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Idaho Commission for Libraries company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Idaho Commission for Libraries company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Indian Valley Public Library company.

In the current year, Idaho Commission for Libraries company and Indian Valley Public Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Idaho Commission for Libraries company nor Indian Valley Public Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Idaho Commission for Libraries company nor Indian Valley Public Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Idaho Commission for Libraries company nor Indian Valley Public Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Indian Valley Public Library company nor Idaho Commission for Libraries company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Indian Valley Public Library nor Idaho Commission for Libraries holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Indian Valley Public Library company nor Idaho Commission for Libraries company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Idaho Commission for Libraries company employs more people globally than Indian Valley Public Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Indian Valley Public Library nor Idaho Commission for Libraries holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Indian Valley Public Library nor Idaho Commission for Libraries holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Indian Valley Public Library nor Idaho Commission for Libraries holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Indian Valley Public Library nor Idaho Commission for Libraries holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Indian Valley Public Library nor Idaho Commission for Libraries holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Indian Valley Public Library nor Idaho Commission for Libraries holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H