Comparison Overview

Indian Rivers Behavioral Health

VS

Catholic Charities

Indian Rivers Behavioral Health

2209 9th Street, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35401, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Indian Rivers Behavioral Health is a non-profit corporation, established under Act 310 of the 1967 Alabama Legislature, to meet the behavioral health care needs of residents of Tuscaloosa, Bibb, and Pickens Counties. Indian Rivers provides a wide range of services and supports for those affected by mental illness, substance abuse, and developmental disabilities. Our services include outpatient psychiatric and behavioral services for children, adolescents, and adults as well as residential services for adults. The focus of all programs offered by Indian Rivers is on recovery and resiliency. At Indian Rivers, we work to help each person define and achieve their best outcome

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 122
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Catholic Charities

901 Chippewa, None, Flint, Michigan, US, 48503
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Catholic Charities of Shiawassee & Genesee Counties has been Providing Help and Creating Hope for those in need since 1941. Offering more than 30 human services and community services program including: the North End Soup Kitchen and Holy Angels Soup Kitchen, serving more than 151,000 meals annually ; Counseling and Prevention Services; Spanish Speaking Information Services; Foster Care & Adoption services; Communty Share Center offering free clothing, personal needs items and emergency displacement services for those in need; Kinship Caregivers offering support to grandparents and caregivers raising grandchildren or the children of family members; and the Mr. Rogers Garden Program providing mentoring and job training for at-risk youth. Volunteer opportunities available.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 3,331
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indian-rivers-mental-health-center.jpeg
Indian Rivers Behavioral Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catholic-charities.jpeg
Catholic Charities
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Indian Rivers Behavioral Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Catholic Charities
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indian Rivers Behavioral Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Catholic Charities in 2026.

Incident History — Indian Rivers Behavioral Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indian Rivers Behavioral Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Catholic Charities (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Catholic Charities cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indian-rivers-mental-health-center.jpeg
Indian Rivers Behavioral Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catholic-charities.jpeg
Catholic Charities
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Online Conference Interruption
Motivation: Disruption of humanitarian efforts in Ukraine
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Catholic Charities company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Indian Rivers Behavioral Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Catholic Charities company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Indian Rivers Behavioral Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, Catholic Charities company and Indian Rivers Behavioral Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Catholic Charities company nor Indian Rivers Behavioral Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Catholic Charities company nor Indian Rivers Behavioral Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Catholic Charities company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Indian Rivers Behavioral Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Indian Rivers Behavioral Health company nor Catholic Charities company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Indian Rivers Behavioral Health nor Catholic Charities holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Indian Rivers Behavioral Health company nor Catholic Charities company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Catholic Charities company employs more people globally than Indian Rivers Behavioral Health company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Indian Rivers Behavioral Health nor Catholic Charities holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Indian Rivers Behavioral Health nor Catholic Charities holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Indian Rivers Behavioral Health nor Catholic Charities holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Indian Rivers Behavioral Health nor Catholic Charities holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Indian Rivers Behavioral Health nor Catholic Charities holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Indian Rivers Behavioral Health nor Catholic Charities holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N