Comparison Overview

Indian Army

VS

United States Air Force

Indian Army

IN, 110022
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://onlinecareer360.com/

The Indian Army is the largest branch of the Indian Armed Forces and is responsible for land-based military operations. Its primary mission is the National Security and Defense of India from external aggression and threats, and maintaining peace and security within its borders. It also conducts humanitarian rescue operations during natural calamities and other disturbances. The Indian Army is one of the three services under the Ministry of Defence. The President of India is the Commander-in-Chief of the Indian Armed Forces, and thus of the Indian Army. The highest ranking military officer is the Chief of Army Staff (COAS), who is also a member of the Chiefs of Staff Committee. The Indian Army came into being at the Independence of India in 1947, and inherited most of the regiments and infrastructure of the British Indian Army that were located in post-partition India.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 32,762
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

United States Air Force

550 D Street West, Suite 1, Randolph AFB, TX, US, 78150-4527
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.airforce.com

The mission of the United States Air Force is to fly, fight and win … in air, space and cyberspace. To achieve that mission, the Air Force has a vision of Global Vigilance, Reach and Power. That vision orbits around three core competencies: developing Airmen, technology to war fighting and integrating operations. These core competencies make our six distinctive capabilities possible. Air and Space Superiority: With it, joint forces can dominate enemy operations in all dimensions: land, sea, air and space. Global Attack: Because of technological advances, the Air Force can attack anywhere, anytime and do so quickly and with greater precision than ever before. Rapid Global Mobility: Being able to respond quickly and decisively anywhere we're needed is key to maintaining rapid global mobility. Precision Engagement: The essence lies in the ability to apply selective force against specific targets because the nature and variety of future contingencies demand both precise and reliable use of military power with minimal risk and collateral damage. Information Superiority: The ability of joint force commanders to keep pace with information and incorporate it into a campaign plan is crucial. Agile Combat Support: Deployment and sustainment are keys to successful operations and cannot be separated. Agile combat support applies to all forces, from those permanently based to contingency buildups to expeditionary

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 237,826
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indian-army.jpeg
Indian Army
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-states-air-force.jpeg
United States Air Force
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Indian Army
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
United States Air Force
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indian Army in 2025.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

United States Air Force has 173.97% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Indian Army (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indian Army cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — United States Air Force (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Air Force cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indian-army.jpeg
Indian Army
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-states-air-force.jpeg
United States Air Force
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Authentication Bypass, Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Volumetric DDoS Attacks
Motivation: Geopolitical retaliation and disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2017
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unprotected Backup Drive
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Indian Army company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to United States Air Force company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

United States Air Force company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Indian Army company has not reported any.

In the current year, United States Air Force company has reported more cyber incidents than Indian Army company.

Neither United States Air Force company nor Indian Army company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

United States Air Force company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Indian Army company has not reported such incidents publicly.

United States Air Force company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Indian Army company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Indian Army company nor United States Air Force company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Indian Army nor United States Air Force holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Indian Army company nor United States Air Force company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

United States Air Force company employs more people globally than Indian Army company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Neither Indian Army nor United States Air Force holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Indian Army nor United States Air Force holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Indian Army nor United States Air Force holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Indian Army nor United States Air Force holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Indian Army nor United States Air Force holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Indian Army nor United States Air Force holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References