Comparison Overview

Index Medicolegal

VS

Indy Malpractice

Index Medicolegal

Suite 303, Second Floor, St Andrews Place, 33 North Street, Spring Hill, Brisbane, 4000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Index Medicolegal has been a trusted provider of Independent Medical Opinions in the fields of Pain Medicine, Anaesthesia, Rehabilitation and Psychiatry since 2002. Our reports are balanced and Courtworthy and our reputation established upon the values of trust and respect. Founded in Brisbane, Australia, as Greenslopes Medicolegal, we are trusted by legal practices, insurance firms and regulatory bodies, for providing expert opinion for when it matters most. Our 20-year history provides us with a deep understanding of our clients’ needs. We consult both interstate and internationally covering Australasia, North America and the UK, priding ourselves on being your local medicolegal partner, with a global reach. Our established panel of Experts consists of 70 Specialists who remain in active clinical practice across a number of specialities are adept at putting individuals undergoing an independent medical examination at ease through their medicolegal examination. Our Experts are accustomed to working on complex matters including personal injury, professional negligence matters and class action lawsuits. We are deeply committed to excellence with all our reports undergoing a thorough internal review process to ensure Index Medicolegal reports are authoritative, balanced and Courtworthy.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Indy Malpractice

9450 N Meridian Street, Suite 250, Indianapolis, IN, US, 46260
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Indy Malpractice is a medical malpractice law firm with a specific focus. We don’t try to be everything to everyone; instead, we focus on helping injured people and their families put their lives back together. As a result, we provide full-service medical malpractice services to Indianapolis, Kokomo, Bloomington, and the surrounding Indiana communities. We work tirelessly to address the legal issues and identify all possible sources of financial recovery. Our founding partners and attorneys have built their reputations by aggressively valuing claims and putting in the effort to achieve meaningful results in negotiations and in court.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/index-medicolegal.jpeg
Index Medicolegal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indymalpractice.jpeg
Indy Malpractice
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Index Medicolegal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Indy Malpractice
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Index Medicolegal in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indy Malpractice in 2025.

Incident History — Index Medicolegal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Index Medicolegal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Indy Malpractice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indy Malpractice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/index-medicolegal.jpeg
Index Medicolegal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indymalpractice.jpeg
Indy Malpractice
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Indy Malpractice company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Index Medicolegal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Indy Malpractice company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Index Medicolegal company.

In the current year, Indy Malpractice company and Index Medicolegal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Indy Malpractice company nor Index Medicolegal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Indy Malpractice company nor Index Medicolegal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Indy Malpractice company nor Index Medicolegal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Index Medicolegal company nor Indy Malpractice company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Index Medicolegal nor Indy Malpractice holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Index Medicolegal company nor Indy Malpractice company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Index Medicolegal nor Indy Malpractice holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Index Medicolegal nor Indy Malpractice holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Index Medicolegal nor Indy Malpractice holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Index Medicolegal nor Indy Malpractice holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Index Medicolegal nor Indy Malpractice holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Index Medicolegal nor Indy Malpractice holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X