Comparison Overview

Independent Women's Forum

VS

Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York

Independent Women's Forum

1875 I Street NW | Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20006, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.iwf.org/

Independent Women's Forum is dedicated to developing and advancing policies that aren’t just well-intended, but actually enhance people’s freedom, choices, and opportunities. We work every day to engage and inform women and create a community to discuss how policy issues – including paid leave, health care, taxes, energy, minimum wage, and education – impact them and their loved ones. To keep informed of IWF media appearances, publications, and events, please sign up here: https://www.iwf.org/connect/

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York

14 Wall St Ste 4E, None, New York, NY, US, 10005
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
https://linktr.ee/cccnewyork

Citizens’ Committee for Children of New York (CCC) is a nonprofit and nonpartisan organization which advances well-being, equity, and justice for all of New York’s children through research, advocacy, and civic engagement. What makes CCC’s approach to child advocacy unique is our use of data and research combined with the best features of public policy advocacy and a tradition of community activism that dates back to its founding over 80 years ago by Eleanor Roosevelt and other concerned New Yorkers. Together with community members from diverse backgrounds and perspectives, we identify barriers to child and family well-being and mobilize around policy, legislative, and budgetary solutions that drive positive systemic change. Our advocacy elevates and centers the experiences of New York’s children, youth, and families, working together towards a city and state in which every child is healthy, housed, educated, and safe.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/independent-women's-forum.jpeg
Independent Women's Forum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/citizens'-committee-for-children-of-new-york.jpeg
Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Independent Women's Forum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Independent Women's Forum in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York in 2025.

Incident History — Independent Women's Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Independent Women's Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/independent-women's-forum.jpeg
Independent Women's Forum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/citizens'-committee-for-children-of-new-york.jpeg
Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Independent Women's Forum company and Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Independent Women's Forum company.

In the current year, Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York company and Independent Women's Forum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York company nor Independent Women's Forum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York company nor Independent Women's Forum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York company nor Independent Women's Forum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Independent Women's Forum company nor Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Independent Women's Forum company nor Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Independent Women's Forum company employs more people globally than Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor Citizens'​ Committee for Children of New York holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References