Comparison Overview

Independent Women's Forum

VS

AYPAL

Independent Women's Forum

1875 I Street NW | Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20006, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Independent Women's Forum is dedicated to developing and advancing policies that aren’t just well-intended, but actually enhance people’s freedom, choices, and opportunities. We work every day to engage and inform women and create a community to discuss how policy issues – including paid leave, health care, taxes, energy, minimum wage, and education – impact them and their loved ones. To keep informed of IWF media appearances, publications, and events, please sign up here: https://www.iwf.org/connect/

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AYPAL

1238 Harrison St, Oakland, California, 94612, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

AYPAL organizes and builds the power of low-income Asian Pacific Islander youth to fight social inequities and to advance an agenda for progressive social change. Through grassroots organizing campaigns, young people are the driving force behind equitable policy initiatives that improve the quality of life for young people and their communities.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/independent-women's-forum.jpeg
Independent Women's Forum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asian-pacific-islander-youth-promoting-advocacy-and-leadership.jpeg
AYPAL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Independent Women's Forum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AYPAL
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Independent Women's Forum in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AYPAL in 2025.

Incident History — Independent Women's Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Independent Women's Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AYPAL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AYPAL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/independent-women's-forum.jpeg
Independent Women's Forum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asian-pacific-islander-youth-promoting-advocacy-and-leadership.jpeg
AYPAL
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AYPAL company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Independent Women's Forum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AYPAL company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Independent Women's Forum company.

In the current year, AYPAL company and Independent Women's Forum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AYPAL company nor Independent Women's Forum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AYPAL company nor Independent Women's Forum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AYPAL company nor Independent Women's Forum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Independent Women's Forum company nor AYPAL company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor AYPAL holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Independent Women's Forum company nor AYPAL company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Independent Women's Forum company employs more people globally than AYPAL company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor AYPAL holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor AYPAL holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor AYPAL holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor AYPAL holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor AYPAL holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Independent Women's Forum nor AYPAL holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H