Comparison Overview

Independent Printing & Packaging

VS

TEAM Concept Printing

Independent Printing & Packaging

1801 Lawrence Dr.,, De Pere, 54115, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.independentprinting.com

In business since 1935, Independent Printing & Packaging is a national supplier of corporate branding solutions specializing in printed presentation materials and custom e-flute & folding carton packaging. We are G7 Master certified. Our pressroom capabilities include digital and conventional printing, foil stamping, die-cutting, embossing, laminating, kitting, and warehousing & fulfillment. Independent Printing & Packaging is centrally located in the Midwest with all manufacturing and assembly done in the U.S.A.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

TEAM Concept Printing

540 Tower Blvd., Carol Stream, IL, US, 60188
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.teamconceptprinting.com

When professionals need a resource for the highest-quality print materials they come to TEAM. Our presses run 24 hours-a-day so we can deliver on the tightest deadlines in the industry. And our experience, knowledge and attention to detail enable us to produce outstanding finished products even the most discriminating clients are proud to show as their own. Best of all, our wholesale direct pricing allows print brokers, agencies and designers to offer one-stop custom print and mail capabilities at a competitive rate. Your business needs partners who can enhance your ability to serve your customers. For a printer, that means speed, flexibility, robust capability and the attention to detail to bring it all together. That's what we strive for every day.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/independent-folders.jpeg
Independent Printing & Packaging
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/team-concept-printing.jpeg
TEAM Concept Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Independent Printing & Packaging
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TEAM Concept Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Independent Printing & Packaging in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TEAM Concept Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Independent Printing & Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Independent Printing & Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TEAM Concept Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TEAM Concept Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/independent-folders.jpeg
Independent Printing & Packaging
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/team-concept-printing.jpeg
TEAM Concept Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Independent Printing & Packaging company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TEAM Concept Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TEAM Concept Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Independent Printing & Packaging company.

In the current year, TEAM Concept Printing company and Independent Printing & Packaging company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TEAM Concept Printing company nor Independent Printing & Packaging company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TEAM Concept Printing company nor Independent Printing & Packaging company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TEAM Concept Printing company nor Independent Printing & Packaging company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Independent Printing & Packaging company nor TEAM Concept Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Independent Printing & Packaging nor TEAM Concept Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Independent Printing & Packaging company nor TEAM Concept Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Independent Printing & Packaging company employs more people globally than TEAM Concept Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Independent Printing & Packaging nor TEAM Concept Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Independent Printing & Packaging nor TEAM Concept Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Independent Printing & Packaging nor TEAM Concept Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Independent Printing & Packaging nor TEAM Concept Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Independent Printing & Packaging nor TEAM Concept Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Independent Printing & Packaging nor TEAM Concept Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References