Comparison Overview

Independence Seaport Museum

VS

Chicago Architecture Center

Independence Seaport Museum

211 S. Columbus Blvd., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Independence Seaport Museum's mission is to discover Philadelphia's river of history and world of connections. We’re all about water! Dive into "River Alive!", an award-winning exhibition that brings the wildlife, science, and wonder of the Delaware River to life. Climb aboard the oldest floating warship in the world on Cruiser OLYMPIA and submerge yourself aboard the World War II-era Submarine BECUNA. Immerse yourself in special interactive exhibits while visiting one of the largest maritime art and artifact collections in North America. In warmer months, join us for a paddle in our boat basin or use your experience to get out onto the river with a kayak excursion. With so much to explore, Independence Seaport Museum is the premier, family-friendly destination on the Penn’s Landing waterfront. The Seaport Museum was founded in 1960 as the Philadelphia Maritime Museum and has become a key component of Philadelphia's waterfront renaissance. We serve 110,000 visitors annually and are accredited by the American Alliance of Museums.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chicago Architecture Center

111 E Wacker Dr, Chicago, 60601, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

When you hit the pavement on one of our 75+ walking tours through Chicago neighborhoods, embark on our award-winning river cruise or visit the stunning riverfront Center, you’re helping fund youth education initiatives, world-renowned events like Open House Chicago and public information campaigns that empower citizens to take an active role in the future of their cities. As a certified nonprofit, all CAC ticket purchases directly support our education efforts and community engagement projects.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 134
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/independence-seaport-museum.jpeg
Independence Seaport Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-architecture-center.jpeg
Chicago Architecture Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Independence Seaport Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chicago Architecture Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Independence Seaport Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Architecture Center in 2026.

Incident History — Independence Seaport Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Independence Seaport Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chicago Architecture Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Architecture Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/independence-seaport-museum.jpeg
Independence Seaport Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-architecture-center.jpeg
Chicago Architecture Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Independence Seaport Museum company and Chicago Architecture Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Chicago Architecture Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Independence Seaport Museum company.

In the current year, Chicago Architecture Center company and Independence Seaport Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center company nor Independence Seaport Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center company nor Independence Seaport Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center company nor Independence Seaport Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Independence Seaport Museum company nor Chicago Architecture Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Independence Seaport Museum nor Chicago Architecture Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Independence Seaport Museum company nor Chicago Architecture Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chicago Architecture Center company employs more people globally than Independence Seaport Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Independence Seaport Museum nor Chicago Architecture Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Independence Seaport Museum nor Chicago Architecture Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Independence Seaport Museum nor Chicago Architecture Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Independence Seaport Museum nor Chicago Architecture Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Independence Seaport Museum nor Chicago Architecture Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Independence Seaport Museum nor Chicago Architecture Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H