Comparison Overview

Incorporated Insurance Group Limited

VS

中国人民保险 PICC

Incorporated Insurance Group Limited

Anglo House, Hornchurch, Essex, RM11 2JS, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-12 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

Incorporated Insurance Group Limited aims to be recognised as one of the leading underwriting agencies in the UK. We employ highly experienced staff dealing with a select panel of key brokers to ensure that our products incorporate the covers our clients need at the right price.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

中国人民保险 PICC

清华西路28号, None, 海淀区, 北京市, CN, 100084
Last Update: 2025-06-03 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

Founded in October 1949, The People’s Insurance Company (Group) of China is the first nation-wide insurance company in the People’s Republic of China and has developed into a leading large-scale integrated insurance financial group in the PRC, ranking 208th on the Global 500 (2014) published by the Fortune magazine. The Company is an investment holding company. The Company operates its property and casualty insurance business through PICC Property and Casualty Company.The Company operates its life and health insurance businesses through PICC Life Insurance Company and PICC Health Insurance Company , The Company centrally and professionally manages most of its insurance assets through PICC Asset Management Company and PICC Investment Holding which is a professional investment company specializing in real estate investments. The Company also carries out non-transactional businesses such as equity and debt investments in insurance and non-insurance capital within and outside the Group through PICC Capital Investment Management Company.The Company has also made strategic investments in non-insurance financial businesses such as banking and trust.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 7,619
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/incorporated-insurance-group-limited.jpeg
Incorporated Insurance Group Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-people's-insurance-company-group-of-china.jpeg
中国人民保险 PICC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Incorporated Insurance Group Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
中国人民保险 PICC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Incorporated Insurance Group Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 中国人民保险 PICC in 2025.

Incident History — Incorporated Insurance Group Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Incorporated Insurance Group Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 中国人民保险 PICC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

中国人民保险 PICC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/incorporated-insurance-group-limited.jpeg
Incorporated Insurance Group Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-people's-insurance-company-group-of-china.jpeg
中国人民保险 PICC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

中国人民保险 PICC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Incorporated Insurance Group Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, 中国人民保险 PICC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Incorporated Insurance Group Limited company.

In the current year, 中国人民保险 PICC company and Incorporated Insurance Group Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC company nor Incorporated Insurance Group Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC company nor Incorporated Insurance Group Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 中国人民保险 PICC company nor Incorporated Insurance Group Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Incorporated Insurance Group Limited company nor 中国人民保险 PICC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Incorporated Insurance Group Limited nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Incorporated Insurance Group Limited company nor 中国人民保险 PICC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

中国人民保险 PICC company employs more people globally than Incorporated Insurance Group Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Incorporated Insurance Group Limited nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Incorporated Insurance Group Limited nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Incorporated Insurance Group Limited nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Incorporated Insurance Group Limited nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Incorporated Insurance Group Limited nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Incorporated Insurance Group Limited nor 中国人民保险 PICC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The Bold Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘percentage’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The ComboServlet in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit the number or size of the files it will combine, which allows remote attackers to create very large responses that lead to a denial of service attack via the URL query string.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and create arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary files on the target machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X