Comparison Overview

INCOO Nederland

VS

Autism Response Team

INCOO Nederland

Kanaalstraat 202 Utrecht, Utrecht 3531CR, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Wil je een burn-out voorkomen of ben je juist herstellende daarvan? Of voel je dat je niet op je plek zit en wil je een twist geven aan je loopbaan? Ben je niet tevreden met je huidige werk? Zit je op een dood spoor? Ben je op zoek naar een psycholoog/coach die jou helpt te groeien? Wil jij dat de resultaten die jij bereikt van blijvende aard zijn? Neem contact met mij op om te horen wat ik je te bieden heb! De naam INCOO staat voor individuele competentie ontwikkeling en dat is precies wat ik doe. Daarbij gaat het om competenties op het gebied van sociale vaardigheden en zelfmanagement. Het ontwikkelen van jouw competenties geeft positieve effecten op een groot aantal gebieden. De toepassing van competentieontwikkeling heeft positieve effecten op de volgende gebieden: coaching, loopbaan ontwikkeling en herstel en preventie van burn-out.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Autism Response Team

undefined, Frisco, Texas, undefined, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Autism Response Team was founded 18 years ago by Dr Ali Sadeghi and Dr Leili Zarbakhsh. Dr Ali Sadeghi was a phenomenal clinical psychologist, whom brought the approach of overall family care to ABA. The idea is to focus on the care and support for the full family unit in order to ensure long term success of ABA treatment for the child. Dr Zarbakhsh has over 30 years of experience as an Educational Diagnostician in the school districts, and combined her commitment to effective education with the science of ABA. She received a second PhD in 2018 in Applied Behavior Analysis. They began the agency with a vision to provide the highest quality of care involving consultation across all specialties. Lisa Mousselli, Dr Sadeghi, and Dr Zarbakhsh began Autism Response Team Texas 6 years. Lisa Mousselli has worked in the field of ABA for 16 years, and came to Texas with the vision of bringing this collaborative ABA model to her home state. This agency has now expanded across North Texas and East Texas due to the high demand for effective and efficient services. Autism Response Team Texas began in order to fill a growing need and demand for individualized ABA treatment designed to impact the patient and their families. Our goal is to provide treatment to all ages with fast results, so the family may continue to flourish and attain all goals set forth even after ABA has graduated the patient.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/incoo-nederland.jpeg
INCOO Nederland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arttx.jpeg
Autism Response Team
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
INCOO Nederland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Autism Response Team
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INCOO Nederland in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autism Response Team in 2026.

Incident History — INCOO Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INCOO Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Autism Response Team (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autism Response Team cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/incoo-nederland.jpeg
INCOO Nederland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arttx.jpeg
Autism Response Team
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

INCOO Nederland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Autism Response Team company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Autism Response Team company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to INCOO Nederland company.

In the current year, Autism Response Team company and INCOO Nederland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Autism Response Team company nor INCOO Nederland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Autism Response Team company nor INCOO Nederland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Autism Response Team company nor INCOO Nederland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither INCOO Nederland company nor Autism Response Team company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither INCOO Nederland nor Autism Response Team holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither INCOO Nederland company nor Autism Response Team company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Autism Response Team company employs more people globally than INCOO Nederland company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither INCOO Nederland nor Autism Response Team holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither INCOO Nederland nor Autism Response Team holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither INCOO Nederland nor Autism Response Team holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither INCOO Nederland nor Autism Response Team holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither INCOO Nederland nor Autism Response Team holds HIPAA certification.

Neither INCOO Nederland nor Autism Response Team holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N