Comparison Overview

Incodia International Ltd

VS

MR Label Company

Incodia International Ltd

2 Seddon Place, Skelmersdale, England, WN8 8EB, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

We are the UK’s largest supplier of gift, loyalty and membership cards – and an innovative provider of FMCG packaging. For over 40 years, we have been supplying leading brands, retailers and membership organisations with cards and carriers – including our ground-breaking range of sustainable Earth Cards. To help our customers respond to changing shopping habits, we create innovative and sustainable solutions for them. Each year, we’re also trusted by big names to fulfil and personalise millions of items to send to our UK customers – from loyalty cards and membership packs, to promotional goods and online orders. For more information visit: www.incodia.co.uk or contact +44(0) 1206 845555

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MR Label Company

5018 Gray Road, Cincinnati, 45232, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1976, MR Label is a family-owned business which has grown from a one-room office into our current facility with over 19,000 square feet. MR Label specializes in producing custom, made-to-order, pressure sensitive labels, decals and tags. We have flexographic, screen, digital, and variable printing capabilities. We also offer a full in-house, pre-press department with complete Macintosh desktop publishing, image-setting, and plate-making services.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/incodia-international.jpeg
Incodia International Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mr-label-company.jpeg
MR Label Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Incodia International Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MR Label Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Incodia International Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MR Label Company in 2025.

Incident History — Incodia International Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Incodia International Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MR Label Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MR Label Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/incodia-international.jpeg
Incodia International Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mr-label-company.jpeg
MR Label Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Incodia International Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MR Label Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MR Label Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Incodia International Ltd company.

In the current year, MR Label Company company and Incodia International Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MR Label Company company nor Incodia International Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MR Label Company company nor Incodia International Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MR Label Company company nor Incodia International Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Incodia International Ltd company nor MR Label Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Incodia International Ltd nor MR Label Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Incodia International Ltd company nor MR Label Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Incodia International Ltd company employs more people globally than MR Label Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Incodia International Ltd nor MR Label Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Incodia International Ltd nor MR Label Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Incodia International Ltd nor MR Label Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Incodia International Ltd nor MR Label Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Incodia International Ltd nor MR Label Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Incodia International Ltd nor MR Label Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N